Naomi Long: 2015 Election

Can naomi Long hold East Belfast?

Mick Fealty tweets wondering whether it will be more difficult than generally assumed for the DUP to take back the East Belfast seat from Naomi Long. (Westminster).
Mick is right but so long as Alliance are given a helping hand…gerrymandering and a place on BBC Spotlight (last night it was Naomi herself) then it is important that she is defeated. Id also add that the feeling in Alliance (I asked someone) is that it was a hard seat to win in 2010 and even then they knew it was a difficult one to retain in 2015.
The 2010 Election was fought against the background of Iris Robinson (60) having an affair with a man of 20 plus. And to a lesser extent some questions about Peter Robinson himself.

It is not 2010. It is not even 2015. So there is no certainty that the next Election will be fought against the background of Flegs.
Sinn Fein, SDLP, Green,NI21, Conservative may only be worth an absolute limit of 5,000 votes but all of those parties would be unwise to give Naomi Long a free run…even if she has the sympathy of many “soft” voters.
Nor is it certain…but it IS possible that UUP will defer to DUP in East Belfast (in exchange for a free run in Strangford or South Belfast).
So could it be a straight fight between Alliance and DUP in 2015? Or effectively so with TUV needing to nibble at DUP and the other parties needing to pin back Alliance?
Certainly, walking from Ashfield Boys School (East Belfast Speaks Out) along Leafy suburban Holywood Road to a taxi office at Belmont Road was interesting. Especially at 10pm.
I do not know East Belfast at all but I was struck by how pleasant Holywood Road is.
I am only a little more familiar with Newtownards Road, Castlereagh, the Mount etc and I am always struck by how thoroughly unpleasant they are.
Inner City problems and Sectarianism would be nasty if I had encountered a gang in that area. Hence the taxi to the train station.
I am barely familiar with Belmont Road or Knock or Stormont.
Yet it strikes me that there are areas that might be described as natural DUP territory. And areas that are natural Alliance territory (more so since UUP fortunes have fallen).
The Flegs Dispute has certainly divided opinion.
Are people in East Belfast more annoyed about the removal of the Flag?
Or more annoyed about the violence on the streets?
But entirely reasonable analysis by Mick Fealty.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Peace Journalism? LetsWriteAlongerism?

Interesting seminar on “Peace Journalism” at QUB on Friday. Hosted by Dr John Brewer and sponsored by the Community Relations Council.
The main problem is that “Peace Journalism” seems like a good idea but is so nebulous that nobody, seemed entirely sure what it is.
PEACE is of course a “moral” and “ethical” term and absolute.
Am I obliged to be moral? I suppose from a religious point of view…I am. From the point of view of a resident, I am only obliged to conform to the Law.
For example, a religious person might believe that Divorce is immoral. But its entirely legal.
Can “Moral” people insist that others behave “morally”?

As a human being, I believe in Peace. Its not an absolute belief. Religious people…just a few weeks ago commemorated War. Now of course that does not mean that they CELEBRATED War (although in some cases they do)….and alleged moral people like George Bush, Barak Obama, Tony B Liar, David Cameron all believe in Peace…but their legacy is the exact opposite.

Singling out Britain…as the most relevant in my world view…they did not go to India or come to Ireland to bring Peace.
At best they brought their own Peace. And the reward for so doing is to go on the moral high ground. Peace, The Law and (Indian or Irish) Nationaliism.
Its slightly too easy for the British to tell Indians that they are sorry for everything before 1947 and to tell the Irish that they are sorry for everything before 1922.
And much too easy to tell me (born 1952) that they are sorry for everything before 1998.
Peace…or rather the Law…trumps Morality.

Whatever is “accepted” is Peace.
In fairness nobody was really sure what Peace Journalism is.
But we live in a Society where if you attach the label “Peace” or “Cross Community” it instantly becomes “a good thing”.
That does a grave disservice to unionists and nationalists alike.
And it does a disservice to anyone…living or dead …who fought for Peace….whatever his/her honestly held vision of Peace was. We cannot just have OUR version.
But somehow, the only worthwhile version of Peace is Justice.
To be honest, I am much more interested in Justice than Peace.

Maybe thats the difference between an Irish Nationalist and a British Unionist.
For one….Justice should trump Peace.
For the other Peace should trump Justice.
A gross simplification of course. But I am after all a nationalist.

Three Journalist Speakers in the morning.
Deaglan de Breadun (formerly Irish Times), Mike Gilson (Editor, Belfast Telegraph) and Malachi O’Doherty…none could really agree with the concept of Peace Journalism…de Breadun almost apologetic, Gilson routinely and O’Doherty stridently.
It reminded me of an event promoted by the British-Irish Studies Institute in March 2011 (I blogged about this on Slugger O’Toole and it is also in my own archives). On that occasion the Conflict Resolutionists invited the Norn Iron artistic community…to paint, write, rhyme for the Greater Good…and the painters, writers and poets lined up during the day to proclaim artistic freedom. They ahead no duty other than to record what they see.
The LetsGetAlongerists had already been defeated before the last session of the day, when old friends Gerry Anderson and Robert Ballagh engaged in a double act, telling anecdotes from the 1960s and 1970s from the old Showband Era.
That day was a massive defeat for LetsGetAlongerism.
There are of course countless examples of Journalists intervening. Jane Morrice, the final speaker of the day fittingly mentioned Michael Buerk, the BBC journalist who brought the Famine in Ethiopia to world-wide attention. An example of Intervention.
And from the Floor, one of Norn Irons leading photo-journalists brought up the particular problems of his colleagues…but for me it brought to mind, the TV Cameraman in Chile, who was so detached he filmed the soldier who killed him.
The notion that Journalists have a responsibility to the Common Good…the one that is decided for them by Conflict Resolutionists…brings to mind that 1950s USA blacklisted journalists as “un-American” and Stalinist USSR and Nazi Germany also regulated journalists.
Of course LetsGetAlongerism is not The same thing.
I’m not claiming that.
I am claiming that the Common Good is a dangerous thing.

But is there an alternative to the Common Good?
The response of Journalists is that they are “professional” and “ethical”.
Well I daresay that most are.
But how is it that the most professional of journalists missed the big story in their own profession…in their own newsrooms even…phone-hacking.
And where exactly is the Ethics of (now seemingly more than) one Rogue Reporter.
But thats PRINT JOURNALISM.
The BBC is different. Well we cant ask Jimmy Savile. But we can ask Stuart Hall.
Hurrah for Common Sense, Professionalism and Ethics.

Nice to see Alex Kane (Irish News and News Letter columnist) on the Q&A Panel. As a columnist he has an agenda…there is no good reason to comply with others.
The Blogosphere was represented by the excellent Lyra McKee…from the world of INVESTIGATIVE Bloggers.
The difficulty for me on Friday was that I am skeptical of LetsGetAlongerism AND Journalism.
Difficult to be nuanced but I tried and…failed.
My contribution…that the Conflict Resolutionist notion for Peace Journalists lets the LetsGetAlongerist Community …the third tribe …off the hook. This tribe has not been subject to as much scrutiny as the unionist and nationalist tribes.
The Moderator, William Crawley asked me to expand on who these “LetSGetAlongerists” might be.
My initial remarks…Statutory Bodies, the Ecumenics School, QUB Academics, Platform for Change….made a lot of sense but in my usual self deprecating mode, I mentioned The Titanic Quarter, Justin Bieber andMTV. Awards, Open Golf….William Crawley himself!!! And Rory McIlroy.
Hmmm not my finest moment.
Wiliam Crawley wondered aloud if I might be a Conspiracy Theorist.

Note to Self: Its ok to use my Blog to make serious points in a very flippant manner. The established readers, with a similar agenda might “get” the nuances.
But out there in real life…I should avoid flippancy.
Live and Learn, I suppose.

There is nothing new in Journalists writing to a narrative. The readership of the (nationalist) Irish News and (unionist) News Letter expect a certain narrative.
And of course a journalist has to look to his own financial well-being.
But there is also a narrative from Society itself. Especially in Norn Iron.
When Michael Bagueley and Maurice Shillington read the BBC Norn Iron News in the 1960s, there was a narrative.
Likewise when “Colonel” Jimmy Hughes reported on the Twelfth.
GOD was in his British Unionist Heaven.
When WD Flackes, Harry Thompson and Larry McCoubrey reported Politics and the News in the 1970s, it was all about Norn Iron under attack from “terrorists”.
In the 1990s, it was all about telling us that the fledgling Peace Process must not be disturbed by too much scrutiny of some of the players.
David Dunseith would do that whole kinda “why dont we all get along better?” on his radio show.
Now that the Agreement has been signed and stalled the narrative is that we much scrutinise the players that went without scrutiny two decades ago.

In short, I dont believe in Censorship…beyond a certain decorum. And I believe in people reporting what they see. And I believe in commentators and bloggers pushing their own agenda.
I dont of course “trust” the so called profession of Journalism…Leveson has demonstrated they have lost any right to trust.
But nor do I believe in Peace Journalism.

I believe in Justice Journalism. Honest Journalism.
If Journalism had been more HONEST in the 1960s we might not have had the CONFLICT.
If Journalism had been more honest in the 1970s we would not have sunk to the depths that we….Irish and British sank.
And if Journalism had been more honest in the 1990s, we would not have the mess of POST-CONFLICT.
And a big shout-out to Duncan Morrow, much amused that he had finally identified the man who had coined the phrase “letsgetalongerist”.

EDIT: There is a defence of Peace Journalism in a blog from the Centre of Peace Journalism at Park University, Missouri, USA. I cant do a link for some reason. It references my Blog, a little unfairly I think. But no harm done.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

Derry Stroke Derry

Whats in a name?
“Doire”. “Derry”. “Londonderry”.
Gerry Aderson of course was being ironic. Referencing “Derry Stroke Londonderry” to highlight the obsessionally nationalist and unionist sensitivities.
Over a year ago, the term “Derry Londonderry” started to be used as a kinda letsgetalongist neutrality.
I predicted (and for once I was right) that it would enter the mainstream and it has….”Derry Londonderry” is now a staple on news programmes.
I cant see Derry GAA rushing to change its name.
And I dont think nationalists should be using the term. Its SHYTE.

To highlight this absurdity, I urge you to start tweeting Hashtag “Derry Stroke Derry”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

East Belfast Speaks Out…Quietly.

So last night East Belfast spoke out…quietly.
I expected more. Indeed I feared more.
I thought there would be folks from the totemic Belmont Bowling Club and maybe the Beast from the East…or at least some Fleggers. Maybe some Short Strand residents, letsgetalongerists.
In the event, not even a row of folks from the UUP, SDLP or Alliance to make sure their man on the Panel got a fair round of applause.
“Names” in the Ashfield Boys School audience include Basil McCrea MLA, Chris Lyttle MLA, Peter Osborne from the Parades Commission, Bill Wright from Lucid Talk, Trevor Ringland from the Conservatives, Jenny Muir and Ross Brown from the Green Party.
Jim Wilson …who is a (whats the word?) “Community Worker” in East Belfast was also up-front. Also one or two people who appeared to be from the local Kneebreakers.
No Jamie Bryson…the Flegger, football mascot, civil rights advocate and volunteer taxi dispatcher.
And a few other faces, who show up at this kinda thing. Indeed the Organiser of the event, James Smith greeted me with the words “you were at Platform for Change on Monday night”.
Even more worryingly Alan from Slugger O’Toole informs me that I am now “one of them”.
Have I been sucked in?
Am I a Blogalongerist? (As Alan puts it).
As I walked up the drive to the School, it was evident from PSNI and plain clothes spook activity (they are not kidding anyone) that the promised Tory on the panel would be a big name…and no surprise that it turned out to be the Secretary of State for Norn Iron…Theresa Villiers.
The other members of the Panel.
Stephen Farry MLA…Alliance, North Down. Minister for Employment and Learning.
Alex Attwood MLA…SDLP representative at the Haass Talks and European candidate for next year.
Mike Nesbitt MLA….UUP Leader.
Dr Deirdre Hannon. …University of Ulster and a familiar face on TV as an observer on Northern politics.

Audience numbers: I would guess around one hundred. Disappointing.
Mark Devenport from the BBC chaired the meeting which was part subsidised by our good friends at Stratagem.
image

So….the Questions.
Opposition. Deirdre Heenan seemed in favour. Stephen Farry made the point that he saw it as a raft of possible reforms. For example, an end to the Designation System.
Farry said that when DUP-SF agree on something, they “bulldoze” past the other Executive Parties but when they disagree , things stagnate.
He was not pursued on this…an end to designation undermines power-sharing and as the unworthy third Party in the Executive…the gerrymander depends on the Alliance Party, they are best placed to do something and dont do anything.
Alex Attwood said there is no real debate about Opposition within SDLP. A surprising thing to say but he is technically correct. Alex said that DUP-SF were in Government but not “in power” and as usual reference SNP as the best government in these Islands.
For Nesbitt…there were other reforms, fewer Departments, fewer MLAs bu Government-Opposition is the next big step to normalisation.
Villiers resorted to platitudes. The British Government wants normalisation but power-sharing is essential.
From the Floor, Trevor Ringland wondered if there was any evidence of the smaller parties working together.
From the Floor, it was stated that there was no point in having a Government when the Parades Commission…a Quango…was really running the show.
Surprisingly, Jim Wilson… a “community worker” said that it was loyalists in Long Kesh in 1974, who initiated the Peace Process we know today.
Alex criticised the Secretary of State for not re-appointing the Parades Commission but Villiers said that the commission had come to the end of its term and there would be no re-appointments.
The implication is that the Brits are not happy.

Moving on to other points. There was reference to the Scottish referendum maybe leading to broader “UK” reform.
Jim Wilson….he’s still a “community worker” …said Alliance bear responsibility for the Flegs and asked Stephen Farry if they would make the same decision again.
Farry said that they would. He wants a proper protocol on Flegs ..Province-wide….and obviously this gets Alliance off the hook but the momentum towards designated days in Derry and Newry. The momentum building around this is worrying for nationalists.
Would a Civic Forum be more democratic? Alex was in favour of it being re-activated but with changes as time has moved on from 1998.
This seems to be something SDLP have adopted recently but frankly I see difficulties…hand-picked clergymen and women, hand-picked academics….jobs for the boys and girls in Platform for Change and maybe even Stratagem.
image

John Larkin and his recent comments led to some fairly heated discussion. For Deirdre, Larkin had been demonised? Not every Victim can have Justice. Nesbitt broadly agreed…that he had done an “Eames-Bradley” (ie talking sense but the concentration was all on one unfortunate remark).
Attwood was more passionate. Nobody had the right to take away Investigations, Inquiries and Inquests…all this was in the ownership of the families.
Attwood was talking like a politician…quite rightly. But it could be claimed he was talking to the Gallery. Deirdre Heenan was talking like an academic.
Being passionate has its place.
Being dispassionate has its place.
I dont think either came across well when the line was blurred.
I would have liked to have heard more on “Information before Immunity” which came from the Floor.

On Saturdays threatened Flegs Protests, Farry appealed for Common Sense, Nesbitt urged the Protestors to forsake their right and Villiers understood the strength of feeling.
Attwood called for the organisers…PUP, UVF (yes) and loyal orders to re-think. He was certain that if one organisation called off the protests, the rest would follow.
Jamie Bryson and Willie Frazer got a mention…someone from the Floor asked what part Teresa Villiers had in their “internment” (sic). And it was a disgrace that laws enacted because of the threat of Muslim (sic) terrorism were being used against Frazer and Bryson.
Predictably Villiers said she had no part in this.

Welfare Reform…Theresa was defending the indefensible. Farry less forthright that Attwood and even Nesbitt who name-checked his party colleague Michael Copeland for the work he has done advocating for his constituents.

Social rather than political issues….Male Suicide, Rights of Fathers, Mental Health, Fuel Poverty, Abortion…and a surprising amount of consensus. Farry perhaps not as “compassionate” as Deirdre, Alex and Nesbitt.
Mike Nesbitt was maybe the surprise package of the night. Dismissed as a lightweight and “TV Mike”….he actually came across as a pretty decent guy with all the right instincts.
But then again….thats what most people here are. Decent.
Oh and a special word for Boyd Black, who tediously condemned the British Labour Party for encouraging sectarianism….its getting to a habit.

And a word of appreciation to Chris Lyttle Alliance MLA with whom I had a few friendly words afterwards.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Platform For Change: Haass Talks

Platform For Change. A meeting to discuss the Haass Talks. Always worrying to see middle-aged men in Lycra. Its funny how poor people ride bicycles thru necessity and middle-class people ride bicycles as some kinda statement.
The usual suspects from Queens University, the Workers Party and (God bless them) Labour (NI)…an episode of “Pointless Celebrities”.
Trevor Ringland made a very able Chair. And the panel was at least stellar.
Rev Lesley Carroll, Presbyterian Minister at Fortwilliam and one of the leading LetsPray-Alongerists. A member of the ill-fated Eames-Bradley Commission.
Dr Dominic Bryan, Head of Institute of Irish Studies at QUB. Author of some books on Symbols and Parades.
Peter Osborne (who looks spookily like David Jeffrey, Manager of Linfield) who is outgoing Chair of the Parades Commission.
Dr Brendan Hamber, Conflict Resolutionist at University of Ulster.
and
Maureen Hetherington from Derry, described as a”community relations practitioner” (I have no idea what that is).
The format was that each panelist would speak for five minutes and then the discussion would be opened up to the Floor.
Worth pointing out that Dominic is an English guy. And Hamber is from South Africa.

Rev Lesley noted that the Business Community had never been supportive or otherwise of the Good Friday Agreement but the Flegs Dipute had made them go public. John Larkin’s statement last week had been a surprise but had at least opened a debate. She still thought Eames-Bradley the best way forward.
There was a danger…a potential that it (The Troubles) could all happen again.
The Good Friday Agreement was about “creating a shared identity”???.
I find that an extraordinary statement. Thats not what I voted for.

Dominic, although English has been based in Belfast for a number of years and only missed one “Twelfth” in twenty two years. He noted the rise in Orange Order parades. They make up the vast majority of 4,500 parades last year -and with just 1,800 in 1985, there was absolutely no basis for the unionist community to believe their way of life is under attack.
There is always conflict about Shared Space. This is even more true in divided societies and even more true again at times of change.
The Scottish police also with an “Orange” problem are seeking ways of limiting Orange parades.
Yet Dominic thinks things are better than before.
Our problems are “only” about parades.
Dominic did have one nonsensical idea. If he was a unionist (actually I always thought that he was)he would seize the opportunity of nationalists agreeing to designated days to fly the British flag and insist it apply in Derry and Newry. He didn’t seem to get the basic premise that the whole point of being a nationalist is to take the Butchers Apron down from the mast….all over Ireland. The Belfast Compromise is an interim measure and/or an elephant trap for unionists.

Brandon Hamber stated that there were five approaches to the Past. …the ostrich, pragmatic, Justice, Blamers and…it will go away.
Dealing with the Past will be messy but must be honest and in the spirit of compromise.

Maureen Hetherington noted that Shared Future had been binned by DUP and Sinn Fein and they were now calling in Haass. She feared the wheels coming off the Agreement.Politicians had failed and she looked to the Grassroots. She quoted Duncan Morrow (I always think its a very bad sign when someone quotes Big Duncan).

The statements from the table had some weight. A definitive quality. Less so…the Floor.
Comparisons were made between the Apprentice Boys in Derry and Orange Order in Belfast. Was it because of the “huge River” running thru the City. If thats the case then it seems a bit odd to hear at a PFC meeting with their obsession to get rid of barriers.
I would like to have seen Peter Osborne pressed on the £100,000 paid to mediators. Frankly….who are they?
Rev Lesley Carroll was scathing about the Fleggers. The Fleg Dispute is a cover for Drugs, Money laundering and Money Lending. If Rev Carroll knows this…why dont the PSNI?
Indeed the PSNI came in for a lot of criticism. Universal agreement that they are not policing the Flegs and parade disputes adequately.
Ross Brown, the Green Party candidate in the European Election next year made the reasonable point that there were no Fleg Protestors in the room. The idea that the Flegger “underclass” might actually attend a PFC meeting in Dukes Hotel sent a shudder thru the Overclass.
Incidently many people known to Slugger O’Toole in the room….including Ian James Parsley. I recognised him from his 2009 Election Poster (for the Alliance Party) AND his 2010 Election Poster (for the Unionists).
It was generally agreed that Richard Haass is involved in Negotiation NOT Consultation.
The panel were stumped by one question. A member of the audience expressed disappointment …he did not want to go home with no idea what to do next. He wanted to hear practical steps….anything at all that “we can all do”.
Lesley Carroll…suggested writing to your MLA, tell them how you feel and support Eames-Bradley.
Dominic Bryan was fed up with flags. We have legislation on hanging election posters on lamp posts so we should legislate for the display of flags and above all insist that the PSNI do their job.
For Osborne it was about joining the Parades Commission…or becoming a new Flegs Commissioner. The least likely Quangos that the aspiring Quango members in a Platform for Change audience would want. Personally Id prefer to be a mediator and get £100,000 from the Parades Commission.
Osborne came across as “de-mob happy” that he was leaving the Parades Commission. And was not so pessimistic. There has always been an “ebb and flow” to the Peace Process.
For Maureen Hetherington, it was about engaging the Grassroots.
For Hamner, we first had to agree on the problem. And had to be honest. Were were making no progress on Segregated Education.

Interestingly, Boyd Black from Labour NI…had been trying to ask a question for the entire length of the meeting but was not picked up by the Chair(Ringland) or Roving Mike (Robin Wilson). Eventually he got to make the point, that The British Labour Party was feeding sectarianism by not organising here. Yeah….boo hoo Mr Black. SDLP have the European Socialist “franchise” for Norn Iron. Just accept it and stop the spoofing that Labour NI is anything other than a “paper party”.
As always there was one member of the audience, who should not be allowed near a microphone and irritated the overly polite PFC audience by a long speech which seemed to about wanting more and better history taught.
This was picked up by a student in the audience. She seemed to have an English accent and wondered why local students did not study History at Queens.
This led Dominic into an amusing rant that there was too much History and not enough Social Sciences…especially Anthropology.
The way Queens University teaches History would make a good Blog post.

But overall…what can I say? As I left Dukes Hotel, Trevor Ringland asked me to be kind. Ive no problem with that.
At its best, it was a well-informed discussion. Certainly better than the “Integrated Education” shambles in the Summer.
There was a dose of Reality. And little sign of the Pointless Celebrities that liked to attach themselves to the letsgetalongerist wagon.
Of course heavily loaded with academics and their MA and PhD students.
Indeed one person expressed irritation and embarrassment that we are incapable of solving our own problems and bring in Richard Haass.
Which would be an excellent point if it wasn’t for the fact that on the five-person panel…Dominic is as English as Tottenham Hotspur and Hamber is South African.
And Id guess half of the contributions from the Floor were from “foreigners” (South African, English, American, Canadian and German).

But I hope Platform for Change is shorn of the “hangers on”. Alliance might have provided some impetus to PFC issues like Bringing Down barriers! Integrated Education and Shared Future but the Alliance Party is delighted to work the DUP-SF system. Ordinary British Politics…well thanks to the British Labour Party, that wont happen. And thanks to NI21, the moderate consensus on Dealing with the Past and victims has been abandoned. The SDLP outreach to the so called middle ground has been abandoned and there are no moderates left in UUP.
Yet curiously, I think that all strengthens Platform For Change.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Workers Party Conference

A comprehensive report on the Workers Party Annual Conference…..

John Lowry stood up. He made a speech. He sat down.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Platform For Change: Preview

On the train from Dublin to Belfast. It has already been a busy day.. Hopefully a short visit to Clonard to remember Fr Alec Reid. And if I feel up to it, I will go along to the Platform for Change meeting.
I have been hard on Platform for Change but I distinguish between those who (like Trevor Ringland) have a proven record of behaving decently and having the courage to actually put their views before the electorate.
But there is an Overclass that uses Platform for Change as an alternative to Politics. Being a member of the Workers Party or Labour NI is not opting INTO Politics. It is a very public admission that a person is opting OUT of Politics.
Real Politicians…Alliance, SDLP, UUP, Conservative are involved in Platform for Change. Other very real politicians like DUP and Sinn Fein could not be arsed.
So PFC comes across as people who are NO kind of politician or the “right” kind of politician. Or the “right” kind of Academic, Journalist, clergy. The relationship between PFC and The Golden Halo in Norn Iron Society is self-defeating.
At heart it is not that much different from the New Ulster Movement of the late 1960s.
An unrepresentative Overclass that only engages with like minded people?
The COMMA PEOPLE…not the COMMON PEOPLE.
People whose names are followed by a “comma” and the “comma” is followed by the multiple degrees and the university.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

LetsPrayALongerists

We have had LetsGetAlongerists for years. But today I introduce LETSPRAYALONGERISTS.

Earlier today, Fr Tim Barrett (Catholic priest) addressed the DUP Conference. What he said, was not nearly as important as the fact that he spoke to the DUP…whose founder the Rev Ian Paisley often spoke out about the curse of Rome and the treachery of the Ecumenical Movement.

Fr Barrett’s speech was not really anything to do with Peter Robinson thinking that the DUP can be attractive to Catholics. The DUP stance on Gay Rights, Abortion and ultra-conservative views is no attraction. Catholics are not one dimensional. They might also be republican, socialist, nationalist, disabled, elderly, young, female, male, rich, poor.
No catholic is going to go into a polling station to vote DUP on Social conservative values.
Nobody …other than a nut job …is going to deny his or her Irishness on the issue of Abortion.
Robinson cannot appeal to Catholics without more robust condemnation of the behaviour of some elements of Orange supporters in the vicinity of Catholic Churches.
Put bluntly, no catholic is going to be so impressed by an Orange bandsman urinating on St Matthews that they will decide to vote DUP.

Fr Barrett was not there to pledge support to DUP. He is one of a group of liberal minded clergymen and women of different faiths. As Dr John Brewer recently said in a lecture at St Oliver Plunketts in West Belfast (I blogged about it here)…the institutional churches (Brewer claims) have not done enough for Reconciliation and that it has been left for mavericks to bear witness.
These voices might well include Fr Tim Barrett.
Its important to say that Fr Tim has the “approval” of the Conflict Resolutionists…he is “the right sort of priest”.

LetsPrayALongerists?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 11 Comments

Where Was I…22nd November 1963

It seems so long ago. November 1963.
Could not then comprehend what fifty years even looked like.
I was living in a small house in West Belfast. Parents and a younger sister.
I was 11 years old.
Manchester United had won the FA Cup a few months previously. The bad years were over. The Beatles had become famous. And I was nearly thru the first term at Grammar School, just a short walk from my home.

My father was I suppose a news junkie. An intelligent man, who lost out on education thru lack of finace but who wanted the best for his children. Confraternity man. Liberal Catholic. Trade Unionist.
The first real news I remember…apart from the Munich Air Crash in 1958….was the early years of President Kennedy, George Wallace, Check Point Charlie, Cuban Missisle Crisis and The Profumo Scandal.

There were only two TV channels. The Telstar satellite was a year of so launched and as I recall, we got grainy pictures from across the Atlantic Ocean.
Friday night. 22nd November.
“Take Your Pick” 7pm. A Quiz Show. …with your Quiz Inquisitor Michael Miles.
If you survived a minute without saying YES or NO, you got to pick a key for one of ten boxes. maybe your key would open Box 13….and you might get a washing machine.

About 7.12pm, a news flash interrupted Take Your Pick.
President Kennedy had been shot.
After a while, his death was confirmed. And I ran to tell my father at his workplace.He already knew.

Strange how little that I actually remember about that evening. Did we get the news feed direct from the new tangled satellite bringing us live pictures from New York and Dallas?
Strange that I dont remember that. Were the news feeds from the Dallas Police station….Jack Ruby shooting Lee Harvey Oswald….”live”” or is my memory influenced by archive footage of Walter Cronkite.
I’m pretty sure it was live and that the funeral procession and Irish Army cadets at the Arlington graveside were “live”.

its a lifetime ago. Then I just could not conceive what half a century looked like.
The year 1963 is as close to 1913 as it is to 2013.
The people I knew then….parents, uncles, aunts….just about every adult I knew then is dead.
My wife seems the only link to my past. She knows some of the people and some of the places.
Children. Grandchildren.
Days like 22nd November mean less than other days….21st January, 19th August, 16th December.
Out there ….is a date with our name…or a loved ones name on it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Larkin…A Long Resignation Letter?

There is the LAW. There is POLITICS.
Maybe Politics is the application of Law, Education, Environment, Health, Defence and all the rest.
There are some professionals…economists, military, doctors, scientists, lawyers who can operate in the political world. And others who cannot.
John Larkin, the Attorney General seems to be in the latter group.
The Office of the Attorney General is one of those offices which works best when you dont even know it exists.
And its hard to imagine that recent statements made over the past twenty four hours have been made without Larkin understanding at least some of the fall-out that would follow. He cannot be that naive.

John Larkin has said the “unsayable” and it probably reflects conversation in the Law Library in Belfast more than the conversation of politicians and the chattering classes at Stormont and beyond.
Larkin has stated that there is no real prospect of convictions for crimes committed decades ago. And really Society should accept this and draw a line under our History.
This is of course saying TWO things rather than one.
And importantly reflects Larkin’s personal feelings, probably the feeling of his advisors and the general thought of the Legal Profession.
If Larkin resigned next week…and surely his position is difficult…then would any successor think so very differently? Surely that would be the first question that journalists would ask.

But coupled with Larkin’s legalistic point that there is no prospect of a prosecution succeeding is his assertion that people…victims…should draw a line. That is not his call to make.

The only political party to support him is NI21. Maybe he will join them.
But DUP and Sinn Fein have condemned him.
But it is unconvincing …DUP will be glad that the old RUC are off the hook but they will pretend to be upset that IRA wont be facing charges.
Likewise SF will condemn that RUC and the British are off the hook while relieved they will have no questions to answer.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment