Sexism, Racism And The TV Western.

I am pretty sure that the first TV Western I ever saw……my granny’s house in around 1958 was “Boots And Saddles”, a little remembered show about the Fifth Cavalry fighting Apaches in Arizona.

Of course in 1959, when we got our own TV we had just two channels….BBC and ITV and for the best part of a decade TV westerns were a staple. With output of three American channels, it meant that some westerns never crossed the Atlantic. But generally speaking we had the  opportunity of seeing a lot of westerns. But with few repeats and no VCRs it meant that we really only had one opportunity. Until…….recently. TCM Channel has shown “Rawhide” and “Maverick” and is currently showing “Gunsmoke” and “The High Chaparel” on a daily basis.

Around the age of eleven (say 1963), I borrowed a very large book on the History of the Wild West. Real photographs, the real story of Wyatt Earp, Wild Bill Hickock, Jesse James, Belle Star and Calamity Jane were so much different from the legends and myths on movies and TV. And…….worse these people looked……dirty, unkempt, hirsute. They stood or sat for photographs in that old fashioned way and carried their guns……a motley collection of guns……or just shoved them into their clothes. No fancy gun belts.

In truth the Movie Western (take a bow John Ford) of the 1940s and 1950s and the TV Western of the 1950s and 1960s are morality plays merely using Kansas, Wyoming and Arizona of the 1870s as a kinda back drop to hang modern morality tales.

The hairstyles, clothing, western towns, the horses……..have more to do with Holywood than Dodge City. Ive rarely sat on a horse that did not decide to…….at best……urinate. And yet those western towns are spotlessly clean and did dirctors order a re-take if a horse ruined a scene by doing what comes naturally to horses? And all those cavalry scouts who tracked war parties of Cheyenne, Sioux and Commanche they looked for hoof prints in the desert………but actually five hundred horses leave a very organic trail that is never seen in a western.

Essentially the TV Western re-cycles a familiar set of story lines and characters……..former gunslinger turned sheriff……cattle baron versus small farmer…..the drifter……..a motley assortment of stage coach passengers holed up in a small ranch.

I still remember an  exciting episode of “Cheyenne” (and saw it recently on You Tube) where a group of people were holed up in a mountain pass and it looked familiar. I had just watched a movie on TV called “Rocky Mountain” a few weeks previously. The actual footage from the movie (1952ish) was used in the TV show (1957ish) and according to wikipedia Warner Brothers Television regularly re-cycled footage and scripts from their movies of a decade earlier. Actually I have just realised that TCM are showing “Rocky Mountain” tonight.

But each studio seemed to have a show based on a theme……”Tales of Wells Fargo”, “The Overlanders” and “Laramie” had stage coaches as the theme. “Wagon Train” and “The Travels of Jamie McPheeters”, “The Oregon Trail”  were set on the wagon trains west. “Bonanza”, “The High Chaparell” and “The Virginian” were set on ranches.

Indeed even in the mid 1960s , I must have been an apprentice socialist because I found Ben Cartwright, Big John Cannon and Judge Garth patronising…………rich men with a social conscience about their neighbours and ethnically different fellow Americans. And again……this was about USA in the 1960s……..more liberalism appeared towards the end of the 1960s. Always struck me that these self-made men might seem even more impressively liberal if they turned over some Ponderosa, Nevada land to the miners….or High Chaparell land to Arizona’s Apaches……..or Shiloh land to Wyoming’s farmers.

Black people rarely appear in TV Westerns except as a plot device. Yet quite a high percentage of “cowboys” were black and many emancipated slaves moved west after the American Civil War. Yet no western acknowledges it except of course in “Blazing Saddles”…a parody.

Nor indeed do the Irish do well out of “westerns”. Some feisty red-headed Maureen O’Hara clones show up in all westerns. And there is the occasional “no Irish here” theme and Sean McClory, seemingly the only Irishman in Hollywood in the 1960s casually over-acts his way thru most westerns…….usually as a charming fraudster. Even in “Alias Smith and Jones” a feisty red-headed reacts badly when Kid Curry tells her his folks came from “Londonderry”. “They must have been Orange” she tells him and that really is more about 1972 than 1872.

Of course after the American “civil rights” war had been won in the late 1960s, Hollywood felt emboldened. Take the fact that the “High Chapparel” had at least two episodes where “Buffalo Soldiers” were central to the plot. Even Uncle Buck seems happy to see them……and yet his back-story is that he proudly rode with Nathan Bedford Forrest in the Civil War.

And take Hop Sing…..the Chinese cook on the Ponderosa. An entire episode is devoted to a family member framed for murder by a local anti-Chinese bigot. For the only time in the long running series “Bonanza”, Chinese people are seen on the streets of Virginia City. After that episode they are never seen again.

And what about “the Weary Willies” an episode towards the end of Bonanza’s run (1970 per IMDb) and guest starring Richard Thomas, a year before he went on to star in “The Waltons”. A large group of “civil war” veterans and their families from both Union and Confederate armies, set up camp on the “Ponderosa” land and are vilified as petty thieves and worse by the respectable citizenry of Virginia City. Of course this episode is NOT about the aftermath of the American Civil War at all. It is actually about Vietnam veterans.

Of course some western series were played for laughs………”Maverick” for example. And somehow all series had lighter and darker episodes…and curiously they sit side by side. “Gunsmoke” (“Gun Law” in USA) for example is a series with which I am not very familiar. It was shown on ITV here…..and in pre-VCR days my family was watching BBC that night.

And it was the Daddy of Them All……running yearly for over twenty years and making stars out of James Arness, Burt Reynolds and Dennis Weaver. So I watch it every lunchtime and I never quite know if I am getting a light or dark episode.

As a rule of thumb…….when Marshall Dillon (James Arness) is central to the story…it is a serious story. But when Festus Haggan (Ken Curtis) his hillbilly deputy who rides a mule..is central to the story …then it is a comedy story. For Festus and his mule and hillbilly ways is a comedy sidekick……Ken Curtis plays him as Gabby Hayes played characters in 1940s movies.

So take today’s episode of “Gunsmoke”. It is called “MayBlossoms” and was made in 1964.

Festus plays a game of poker and wins a new fangled joinery tool…….a spirit level and immediately discovers every floor and wall in Dodge City is not straight. And his hillbilly cousin……rides into Dodge (on a mule of course) and she has come to marry the much older Festus because she was betrothed to him at her birth. Festus is of course set in his ways……..so the set up is comic……albeit a clichéd and stereotypical representation of the hillbilly. For example, Mayblossoms is asked to leave the town’s boarding house as she wants to share her room with the mule. As Festus says “these city folk have mighty peculiar ways”. So Festus buys a little run down shack for Mayblossoms.

It is a strange episode. It is as if The Man With No Name wandered into Petticoat Junction. But then something which should be VERY dark happens. The gambler who has lost that spirit level to Festus pays Mayblossoms a visit. And we dont see what happened. It is after all ….1964.

But when festus returns to the shack….mayblossoms tells him “I guess I aint fit for marrying nobody now”. In other words…..she has just been raped. While Marshall dillon and the Doc are kindly, there is no serious thought that this is actually a very serious crime. In fact…..the tone is that this is……well……unfortunate.

But there is twist. Festus walks up to the bad guy and shoots him dead. And he is relunctantly arrested but as Matt Dillon says no jury will convict. Meanwhile another hillbilly cousin tracks down Mayblossoms and takes her back home to marry. Nobody mentions the rape. And everybody lives happily ever after…….including Festus in his prison cell………noting that everything in this world is at the wrong angle, including the bars in his cell.

Truly an odd experience…….to watch a comedic episode of “Gun Smoke” and be ambushed by a story of the very darkest kind. I still cant work out if it was grossinsensitivity in 1964 or if there was a subtle shock tactic embedded in the plot. I wish I thought the latter.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 13 Comments

Murder

Part of “blogging” is thinking up a good, catchy headline. After all blogging is not a serious business.

I have a bad cold today. Mrs FitzjamesHorse went off to work today at about 7.30am. I waved her off as usual……at the risk of sounding “corny”, the last thing we always say is “I love you”. Sometimes I feel guilty at retirement. I am of course older than Mrs FJH. Indeed she would say that I am much much much older. She has a few years to go before she gets to retire.

So as usual she left for work….7.30am. And I went back to bed to sleep off the cold.

I didnt get up until around 11.15am……..switched on the BBC News. Maybe find something to blog about……Manchester United, Jimmy Savile, whatever.

And there was a familiar stretch of the M1 Motorway, where a prison officer had been murdered………..at around the same place and time when my wife was going on to the motorway.

As it turns out, Mrs FJH knew nothing about this until she got to work. She will of course have a detour coming home.

Depressing. The murderers car was found abandoned in Lurgan. A helicopter is overhead. And there is something depressingly familiar likely to happen. Arrests….low scale rioting….People will be charged. Or released. Or detained in custody. And then (months later) released. Or acquiited. Or found guilty. And in a nihilistic way they will see it all as an occupational hazard.

Depressing. Very depressing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 10 Comments

President Visits Belfast

An t-Uachtarán na h-Éireann will be visiting Belfast today. He will be speaking at the annual meeting of the Citizen Advice people before going on to visit Clonard Monastery in West Belfast. I should point out that Mrs FJH will be there.

The set piece will be a speech by President Ó hUiginn to the British Council at Queens University Belfast. The great and the good in the Golden Halo of LetsGetAlongerism will be there. Wonder if Deirdre Heenan will be there. She is a member of his Council of State. Wonder if former-member Quintin Oliver (a former member) will be there.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 10 Comments

The Beautiful Game?

Even for a Manchester United fan….like myself….Sunday’s 3-2 win over Chelsea at Stamford Bridge was a depressing affair.

Football has become toxic. What happens during the course of the ninety minutes seems almost a distraction to what happens before and after a match. Increasingly the mind games at managers conferences and leaks to selected journalists as well as what happens in the corridors of power in the Football Association Headquarters, Premiership Headquarters and the Professional Footballers Association seems to be the real game. And as soon as people sign up to Twitter accounts, it only makes it worse.

As every football fan knows…..History plays a part…….it enhances……or should enhance our experience. For example, every time Manchester United play Southampton, reference will be made to the 1976 FA Cup Final. And of course every time Celtic play Rangers…..well need I say more?

But now we know that the entire football season is merely a long list of vendettas. Teams play each other so often in key games…Premiership, FA Cup, League Cup and Europe……and the atmosphere is increasingly poisonous.

Take Sunday. John Terry, the Chelsea captain sat in the stands. Banned for four games because he racially abused Anton Ferdinand of Queens Park Rangers a year ago. Rio Ferdinand, brother of Anton is on the Manchester United team. He is routinely booed by Chelsea fans.

The game itself. Manchester United lead 2-0 after just 12 minutes and Chelsea pull back to 2-2 in the second half and the game seems to be swinging their way. They then have a player sent off for a “professional foul” and the initiative swings towards Manchester United. It is a straight-forward decision. The decision to send off a second Chelsea player is more problematic. Did Fernando Torres dive? Or did he just make the most of minimal contact. The referee Mark Clattenburg decides he has dived and awards a second yellow card. He is off.

If Torres was treated harshly, there is no consolation in the fact that his first yellow card in the game should probably have been a red card. By now Chelsea..and their supporters….and their coaching staff are feeling hard done by. And there is a series of seemingly “mouthy” incidents involving the referee and Chelsea players. All compunded by Manchester United scoring a third (and as it turned out)winning goal which was clearly off-side.

Referees and their linesmen make mistakes. So do players. So do coaches. And it is a cliché that these bad decisions even out over the course of a season. Maybe they do. Maybe they dont. But bad decisions seem a part of the game.

All this was bad enough. But some hours after the game, news filtered out that Chelsea had made an official complaint that the referee Clattenburg had used “inappropriate language” to two of their players. Later there were hints that one or more of these remarks was not racist but had national overtones.

Later there were suggestions that Clattenburg might have referred to Juan Mata as a “Spanish tw**” and the word “monkey” might have been said to John Obi Mikel.

This is gobsmacking. Why on earth would a referee of Clattenburg’s standing….two months ago he refereed the Olympic Games Final…..jeopardise his livelihood by using such language to a player……to two players? It is really unprecedented…..except for the salient fact that Chelsea, reeling from the John Terry incident and a sense of injustice (entirely misplaced) have form for complaining about alleged misbehaviour by match officials (Andres Frink and Graham Poll) only to humiliatingly withdraw the claims. Mud sticks……..and Chelsea have a reputation for throwing it about.

But…….if a player, players or club make this kinda allegation it MUST be properly investigated……including if necessary by the Police. And if Clattenburg really said these things…then his career is over. If on the other hand he is innocent, action must be taken against Chelsea….again.

For now, he is suspended while investigations proceed.

But there is a curious aftermath. After the game……..a group of Chelsea players and officials had to be restrained from attacking Clattenburg in the dressing room.

I present two theories.

One….Players and officials were justifiably angry at racial abuse and in the heat of the moment threatened to “break (Clattenburg’s) f**king legs”.

Two….Players and officials could not take the defeat, including the off-side “goal” confronted Clattenburg with the “break your legs” comment and realising the serious charges they might face (again!!) “got their retaliation in first” by putting out the story of inappropriate language.

There are high stakes here. Clattenburg’s livelihood. Possible disciplinary consequences for Chelsea players…and indeed Chelsea FC if these allegations are proved false.

But as a consequence …..there is even more “History” between Chelsea and Manchester United.

And to make matters worse the clubs meet again tomorrow night….in a League Cup game. It will be even more toxic.

The Beautiful Game?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 14 Comments

“Feck It!…Enjoy It!”

A very interesting documentary on Father Brian D’Arcy tonight.

Father Brian is a 67 year old priest……attached to the Passionist Order in County Fermanagh. Thru appearances on TV, his radio show and his weekly column in “The Sunday World” (a tabloid), he has attracted a lot of support from ordinary Catholics and a lot of criticism……from the Vatican.

The documentary followed him as he wrestled with his conscience over a period of months. The Vatican has moved to silence him. At one level the documentary was unconvincing……fly on the wall docs never work for me…….the unseen cameras and lights, the off-camera director’s voice and a certain lack of reality. It was always likely that aftersixty minutes of very public angst, Father Brian would announce that he had decided to stay in the priesthood.

I declare a small interest in the priesthood. My cousin much loved but irritatingly “conservative” celebrated fifty years as a priest recently. He has no siblings and frankly our wider family circle has maybe deserted him to some extent……we………..his cousins have or had wives, husbands……children, grandchildren and even great-grandchildren. We have had to learn to live with fewer certainties than we had in the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s. Seemingly my priest-cousin’s life has stayed the same while ours have moved on.

His fiftieth anniversary of ordination was actually an eye opener. None of his relatives realised that in his own way he has made a major contribution to make peoples lives better. I cannot be specific, except to say his is a story worth telling………..and indeed his religious superiors have advised him (in retirement) to tell the story.

So have I.

I have even offered to spend as long as it takes to write it all down. But my priest-cousin will have none of it. He is……he says a Marian priest ….he has devoted his life to the Virgin Mary and models his life on her discretion or invisibility.

To a non-Catholic……….and to those who have in some way been hurt by the catholic Church, this maybe seems risible…….stupid. I urge anyone thinking of making a comment here to be extremely temperate.

My priest-cousin does not really like priests like Brian D’Arcy or specifically the Association of Irish Priests, a body of priests generally perceived to be “liberal”.

Yet……allowing for the fact that there were unconvincing aspects to the programme, Brian D’Arcy was himself entirely convincing, not least when he spoke about the sexual abuse he suffered as  young noviciate at the hands of a confrere ………..and how he later conducted the funeral of his own abuser.

So essentially the programme was a journey……..interesting in itself……as Brian D’Arcy talked thru his dilemna with a “conservative” priest, old friends like actor, Frank Kelly (Father Jack Hackett), an Austrian “liberal” priest and a man (now married) who had been a confrere for ten years (ordained on the same day). He also agonised about marriage……”who would want me……I am 67 years old”. He never broke his vows of celibacy but yes he had been in love. Celibacy it is claimed…….allows the space to love everyone……but this has not been his experience.

But perhaps…….most movingly, he does not have a home. And here is the thing. I have a home. I take it for granted. Of course many people whether or not in the religious life CHOOSE celibacy and enjoy their lives……but Brian D’Arcy shares the loneliness of people who are not happy in their celibacy.

Almost thirty years ago……two nightts before we got married………..I got a phone call (about 11.30pm) from a priest at Clonard (a Redemptorist) who said he would meet me at my aunt and uncles small terraced house in Beechmount and he walked over to see me and (the soon to be) Mrs FitzjamesHorse.

My Uncle Charlie, a very religious man………asked the Redemptorist a question. Referencing the 1930s and parish missions where bull-necked Redemptorists reduced entire churches to tears with fire and brimstone sermons……….and noting how Clonard 1982 was about LOVE……..my Uncle Charlie said “Father which way is right?” and our Redemptorist friend simply replied “its like this Boss…take all the honey you can get”.

So tonights documentary ended as expected with Father Brian D’Arcy getting authority from his superiors to serve another four years as rector of his monastery in County Fermanagh. His goal is to be an authentic voice in a dysfunctional institution…………which strangely is exactly what Life asks of us all.

He is a decent man…….a liberal priest. My cousin also is a decent man…….a conservative priest.

All thru the documentary, I was trying to find a snappy phrase which would serve as a headline for this blog. And I couldnt think of one………until the very last words Brian D’Arcy spoke to camera……

“Feck it!……Enjoy it!”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

If You Can Remember The 1960s…..

As they say…….if you can remember the 1960s, you were not really there.

It seems to me that my earliest memories of pop culture were around 1960 in Coalisland, County Tyrone. My older cousin/Godmother Bernadette, would listen to “Housewive’s Choice” on the BBC Radio Light Programme. It was the only concession the BBC made to “pop music”. The big stars were Cliff Richard and the Shadows and Billy Fury.

Of course Elvis Presley was big too……but really people saw him (already) as a movie star rather than a rock’n’roll legend. The old Gaumont cinema (in Castle Lane Belfast where BHS now stands) nearly always had an Elvis movie……with stills of bikini-clad girls outside.

Then the Beatles burst on to the scene in 1962, followed by more “beat groups”……….the Rolling Stones, the Animals, the Who, the Hollies, Herman’s Hermits, the Dave Clark Five……….and TV started  finding programmes with unlikely presenters………TV professionals such as Keith Fordyce presented “Ready Steady Go”, David Jacobs presented “Juke Box Jury” and Kent Walton (yes the man you remember from commentating on Saturday afternoon wrestling) presented “Discs A Go Go”. And “pop” entered the mainstream when “Top of the Pops” first aired on 1st January 1964.

As an 11 year old…….I threw myself into the “new” culture. A regular reader of New Musical Express and all that. Not to mention Radio Caroline, the pirate ship anchored off the Isle of Man coast……..and not to mention Radio Luxembourg. Of course the British Government reacted to the pirate ships……eventually……..by setting up BBC Radio One (September 1967) and simply bringing the outlaws like Tony Blackburn into the Establishment.

Quick piece of Trivia…….the first record played on Radio One was “Flowers in the Rain” by The Move. And yes I was wide awake to hear it. Of course pop culture is fast moving………between 1962 and 1967, we had Carnaby Street and “Swinging London” and several of the pop groups (Swinging Blue Jeans, the Applejacks) were simply one hit wonders, while others like Freddie and the Dreamers and Herman’s Hermits settled for show biz and cabaret.

And other figures within groups…….like Graham Nash of the Hollies and Pete Townsend of the Who started thinking that “pop music” should become more serious, newly marketed as “rock music”.

1967………….the Summer of Love in San Francisco and Sgt Pepper in London. Musicians started to think of themselves as………well…….important. In the great Pop-Rock Civil War, I was firmly on the side of “Pop”. Indian gurus, sitars and all that are all very well………but call me old fashioned I just like 2 minutes 47 seconds of three guitars and drums. I dont like when Music becomes complicated.

When the “pop” thing ended circa 1971……there was a kinda choice…………progressive rock, heavy metal, glam rock……………..but I went for the singer-songwriters like Simon & Garfunkel and country rock such as the Eagles, elfin songstresses like Linda Ronstadt and girls with cowboy hats like Emmylou Harris.

Yet the 1960s are in the News again…..thanks to Jimmy Savile. As Max Clifford (the publicist) stars from that era are knocking on his door. They were, he says “hedonistic days” and stars are worried that they might have done something inappropriate or even illegal with teenage or even underage girls.

Lets be frank……pop stars of the 1960s are like todays Premiership Footballers…….or I suppose its more accurate to say that 1960s pop stars are exactly like pop stars in 2012. Even the ugliest member of any boy band need never be…..lonely.

They have won the lotto…….they are……….eligible young men and act accordingly.

But heres the thing. Way back in the 1960s……the BBC banned “Lets Spend the Night Together” (the Rolling Stones and would only play the B-side “Ruby Tuesday”. RTE refused to play “If You Gotta Go” (Manfred Mann)……………..and there were dark mutterings about “Pretty Flamingo” (Manfred Mann) as it was apparently about prostitution. Dave Dee Dozy Beaky Mick and Tich had their song “Bend It” criticised …..seemingly about …well………..how can I put this………it had the same subject matter as “Bend Me Shape Me” (Amen Corner) and “Hang on Sloopy” (the McCoys).

Surely not.

The 1960s were an odd time. I got my first record player in 1968……and the first record I ever bought was actually a “long player” (as we called albums back then). It was called “Gary Puckett and Union Gaps Greatest Hits featuring Young Girl”).

Now actually nobody ever suggested banning “Young Girl” and the subject matter was……..lin the words of wikipedia “The song is sung from the point of view a man distressed to find out his lover is under an acceptable age”.

Well that beats Banagher ………isnt that really all we need to know about the 1960s that a song about feelings about underage sex was under the radar.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Welcome Back Newt!

I see Brian Walker the unionist (I hesitate to say “liberal unionist”) commentator on Slugger O’Toole has drawn attention to an article by potty-mouthed “liberal unionist” journalist Newton Emerson in one of todays papers.

Seemingly Newt welcomes the collapse of the UUP and SDLP as a means of bolstering the “middle ground” (that would be the Alliance Party).

It has long been my belief that there is an agenda …shared by key Slugger contributors and their allegedly influential backers to bolster the Alliance Party. Walker’s dwelling on Newt’s article does little to make me re-consider my analysis.

I think we can look forward to more of the same kinda attacks on the SDLP by Emerson.

The game plan of the letsgetalongerists is to undermine SDLP and UUP.

Clearly the UUP is imploding……..and it was certainly true that SDLP was in decline. SDLP, I think most would agree have had a pretty good year. While Newt cries crocodile tears for Samuel Brush (DUP councillor), I wonder if the SDLP revival is really whats needling Emerson.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 18 Comments

Politics And The American Sitcom

A very interesting programme on BBC2 tonight. With the American Presidential Election now just ten days away, it posed the question that Europeans might better understand the reality of American life thru the “sit com” rather than the Presidential Debate.

It raised the interesting (seeming) contradiction that “Modern Family” is actually the favourite sitcom of the Republican Party……despite teen sex, a gay couple with an adopted child and an inter-racial marriage. It also claimed that  “The Middle” featuring the daily trials of a mid-west, middle class family in post credit-crunch America was nearer to the actuality of American life than the impression we would get from debates and speeches which are essentially about Ideology rather than Real Life.

The first aspect of American Life in sitcom…. which it looked at was Gay Rights. In its day (late 1970s) “Soap” was actually looked on as revolutionary. I remember it well ……my father hated it…..and to a twenty-something as I was then……in itself my father’s inability to “get” “Soap” was a recommendation. It made a star of Billy Cristal playing the part of Jody, the first gay character in sit-coms. Yet conservatives AND gay rights activists were outraged by Jody Dallas……he was a stereotype rather than a character………and frankly an old clip from the show was uncomfortable viewing. Indeed Gay Rights activists claimed that “Soap” had actually set Gay Rights back……no sitcom touched the subject for almost twenty years until “Ellen” literally came out. This was the watershed moment that brought gay characters into the living room…….”Will and Grace” for example. It was posed that all American families know and accept a gay couple or have accepted gay members of their own families.

Strangely the second aspect was Abortion. A touchstone issue……I think of it as totemic rather than “real” in American politics. It surprises me that Abortion was ever a storyline in a sitcom. The sieries “Maude” was never shown in Britain and Ireland. And the documentary underscored the fact that no modern sitcom dare touch this subject. Yet it HAD been tackled as far back as 1972 as a storyline in “Maude” (played by Beatrice Arthur). Again the clip seemed rather uncomfortable…..as a sit com.

But here the documentary contrasted the fact that ….on the subject of Abortion ……American sitcoms had become more “conservative” while on the issue of Gay Rights, American sitcoms  had become more liberal. The documentary attributed this to Abortion being more divisive and to the influence of Religion. A clip from a banned episode of “Family Guy” on the subject of abortion led into the third aspect…….Religion.

Religion. Both examples were taken from cartoons. My favourite programme is “The Simpsons” and they are comfortable with having God as a regular guest star and showed clips from the excellent episode where Homer’s house burns down (he had not gone to Church) and rages at God, before Rev Lovejoy points out that God didnt burn his house down …but was moving in the hearts of Apu, Flanders and Krusty who had rescued Homer from the flames. Slightly heavy-handed and yet effective point.

I have never taken to “Family Guy” (I find it cruel) or “South Park” ………yet my sons love it. History tends to repeat itself. My father did not understand “Soap”. I dont understand “South Park”. It is essentially a generational thing. The clip…….the Mormon religion and Joseph Smith being ridiculed seemed to me typical of “South Park” and yet there was a twist…….a welcome one……..where a Mormon boy told the South Park kids that maybe his religion was total crap……but the point was that it had given him a loving family and a sense of decency and that the South Park kids were the intolerant ones. Now………I wasnt expecting that. Seemingly “South Park” targets hypocrisy……..conservative AND liberal.

Race……a clip shown from the 1970s where a black family was shown in a positive light (I forget the name ……..like “Maude” it was never shown here……..and of course “The Cosby Show” which was the ultimate aspirational family…..they just happened to be black. Seemingly 48 million watched the final episode. And yet the documentary suggested that this was  a “peak”. Set in New York……like say “Friends” and “Sex in the City” but these two shows had “all white” casts.

A confession……I hated “Sex in the City” and I hated “Friends” even more. I could never work up any enthusiasm for their mix of friendship and I dont think it is merely generational. If I never see Chandler, Joey, Ross, monica, Rachel and Phoebe again ……..I will be happy.

And yet……”Friends” topped the ratings with white Americans but was poorly received by black Americans. And depressingly there were actually “black” versions of these shows available on “cable”. This seems to show that the availability of multi-channels allows people to watch shows with which they can identify…..and that seems a step back from the high of “The Cosby Show”.

And the documentary concluded that it would be wrong to think of American Politics as only Republican and Democrat. That there is a third way, not yet channeled into organised politics. That TV is ahead of the curve. That “Family Guy” and “South Park” are………libertarian.

To be honest “libertarianism” frightens me. I am a socialist….so I like the notion of a “society”. Libertarianism seems to be as selfish as Conservatism….albeit with a “liberal” social agenda. It is I think the new conservatism of low tax, minimalist government and a recognition of modern morality.

An interesting programme and not without relevance here in the North of Ireland. Nearly two years ago, I attended a conference organised by the Conflict Resolutionists thru the British-Irish Studies Institute. It brought together writers, artists, poets, historians to discuss the notion that they should perhaps be “socially responsible” and depict positive aspects of Norn Iron……to lead us away from our nationalism and unionism. Of course I was delighted to see that the Belfast artistic community rejected this notion……..ART IS ABOUT SHOWING LIFE AS IT IS…………ART IS NOT ABOUT HOW LIFE SHOULD BE. IT IS NOT ABOUT SOCIAL ENGINEERING.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 17 Comments

Slugger Watch

A great week for Slugger O’Toole’s favourite ex-BBC man. He gets to start a thread with the word “Londonderry” in the headline. AND he gets to start one with “UK City of Culture” in a headline.

And he will probably get some chances to rebuke people for concentrating on the “name” issue.

Well played sir!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 4 Comments

Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam And Slugger O’Toole

Strange thing happened last night.

I got an email from a Sluggerite, stating “I would like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn”.

Now there might well be a logical explanation, including of course that it just happens to be someone with the same name and occupation/s as a Sluggerite. I still find it curious however. Because I am not really a very influential figure…….indeed I am the least influential figure you will ever meet. Having me in your LinkedIn connexions would do you absolutely no good on LinkedIn or the wider freemasonry of Networking.

I  dont even know any influential people……and I dont even have a job.

So why on earth would somebody as influential as this Sluggerite thinks he is want to enhance(???) his networking by signing me up.

So I suppose I should just treat it as “Junk Mail” but it does make me just a bit curious about who holds my email details.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment