The Beautiful Game?

Even for a Manchester United fan….like myself….Sunday’s 3-2 win over Chelsea at Stamford Bridge was a depressing affair.

Football has become toxic. What happens during the course of the ninety minutes seems almost a distraction to what happens before and after a match. Increasingly the mind games at managers conferences and leaks to selected journalists as well as what happens in the corridors of power in the Football Association Headquarters, Premiership Headquarters and the Professional Footballers Association seems to be the real game. And as soon as people sign up to Twitter accounts, it only makes it worse.

As every football fan knows…..History plays a part…….it enhances……or should enhance our experience. For example, every time Manchester United play Southampton, reference will be made to the 1976 FA Cup Final. And of course every time Celtic play Rangers…..well need I say more?

But now we know that the entire football season is merely a long list of vendettas. Teams play each other so often in key games…Premiership, FA Cup, League Cup and Europe……and the atmosphere is increasingly poisonous.

Take Sunday. John Terry, the Chelsea captain sat in the stands. Banned for four games because he racially abused Anton Ferdinand of Queens Park Rangers a year ago. Rio Ferdinand, brother of Anton is on the Manchester United team. He is routinely booed by Chelsea fans.

The game itself. Manchester United lead 2-0 after just 12 minutes and Chelsea pull back to 2-2 in the second half and the game seems to be swinging their way. They then have a player sent off for a “professional foul” and the initiative swings towards Manchester United. It is a straight-forward decision. The decision to send off a second Chelsea player is more problematic. Did Fernando Torres dive? Or did he just make the most of minimal contact. The referee Mark Clattenburg decides he has dived and awards a second yellow card. He is off.

If Torres was treated harshly, there is no consolation in the fact that his first yellow card in the game should probably have been a red card. By now Chelsea..and their supporters….and their coaching staff are feeling hard done by. And there is a series of seemingly “mouthy” incidents involving the referee and Chelsea players. All compunded by Manchester United scoring a third (and as it turned out)winning goal which was clearly off-side.

Referees and their linesmen make mistakes. So do players. So do coaches. And it is a cliché that these bad decisions even out over the course of a season. Maybe they do. Maybe they dont. But bad decisions seem a part of the game.

All this was bad enough. But some hours after the game, news filtered out that Chelsea had made an official complaint that the referee Clattenburg had used “inappropriate language” to two of their players. Later there were hints that one or more of these remarks was not racist but had national overtones.

Later there were suggestions that Clattenburg might have referred to Juan Mata as a “Spanish tw**” and the word “monkey” might have been said to John Obi Mikel.

This is gobsmacking. Why on earth would a referee of Clattenburg’s standing….two months ago he refereed the Olympic Games Final…..jeopardise his livelihood by using such language to a player……to two players? It is really unprecedented…..except for the salient fact that Chelsea, reeling from the John Terry incident and a sense of injustice (entirely misplaced) have form for complaining about alleged misbehaviour by match officials (Andres Frink and Graham Poll) only to humiliatingly withdraw the claims. Mud sticks……..and Chelsea have a reputation for throwing it about.

But…….if a player, players or club make this kinda allegation it MUST be properly investigated……including if necessary by the Police. And if Clattenburg really said these things…then his career is over. If on the other hand he is innocent, action must be taken against Chelsea….again.

For now, he is suspended while investigations proceed.

But there is a curious aftermath. After the game……..a group of Chelsea players and officials had to be restrained from attacking Clattenburg in the dressing room.

I present two theories.

One….Players and officials were justifiably angry at racial abuse and in the heat of the moment threatened to “break (Clattenburg’s) f**king legs”.

Two….Players and officials could not take the defeat, including the off-side “goal” confronted Clattenburg with the “break your legs” comment and realising the serious charges they might face (again!!) “got their retaliation in first” by putting out the story of inappropriate language.

There are high stakes here. Clattenburg’s livelihood. Possible disciplinary consequences for Chelsea players…and indeed Chelsea FC if these allegations are proved false.

But as a consequence …..there is even more “History” between Chelsea and Manchester United.

And to make matters worse the clubs meet again tomorrow night….in a League Cup game. It will be even more toxic.

The Beautiful Game?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to The Beautiful Game?

  1. sammymcnally says:

    The pressure that referees are put under by players in Ladyball is ridiculous – as has been mentioned numerous times rugby players are expected to respect the referees decision or be severely punished and football should follow that example (just as they should with goal line technology).

    • Two different issues.
      In Rugby…a game for thugs played by gentlemen (cant remember who said that) there is certainly a tradition of Respect. Also a tradition of Omerta.
      Goal-line technology….No.
      The most beautifyl thing about the beautiful game is that it is exactly the same at Stamford Bridge as it is on the Belfast Council pitches on the Shore Road. Actually now that I think about it, I have seen and heard some pretty depressing things in public parks.

      But…..I think technology would actually introduce or amplify two different classes of Football.

  2. Mark. says:

    Chelsea certainly have ” previous ” when it comes to smearing the name of match officials ….. and as we saw with the recent FA probe into John combat 18 Terry , they don’t mind telling a few porkies when it suits them . How can they be taken seriously when Terry is still club captain ? .

    Football was a funny old game but it’s not anymore . The antics of certain managers on the sidelines only increases the tension on the terraces . Roberto De Mateo ( ? ) grabbed Antonio Valencia by the shirt to stop him taking a quick throw in yet we won’t hear about that because as a club , ManU never try to stir things post match …….unlike the big girls blouses that reside at the Bridge . They’ve always been sore losers going back to the days of Ken Bates .

    On the subject of technology , I understand the traditionalist views of FJH regarding the same rules for sunday league / premiere league ….. if technology was around in ” 66 ” would England have won the WC , would Maradona’s hand of God goal stood in ” 86 ” ? .

    Anyway …the real winners of sundays game are Man Utd , so nothing has really changed . That’s ok then !!

  3. It is pretty bleak at the moment, isn’t it?

    TBH, the press have a huge part to play in fanning this discontent and placing the whole event wildly out of proportion (this being one of the few parts of life I think they have an actual influence over).

    Every Saturday night, that mopping Scottish b******s Hansen with his tired cliches (ahem) together with either 2d Shearer or has been Lawrenson tell all that things are getting worse and worse with referees, that they are inconsistent and ruining the game when nothing could be further from the truth. The standard of refereeing is pretty high at the moment and they are having to adjudicate games where the pressure is just too much, it’s a recipe for disaster tbf.

    Ah well, we made mince meat of the Saints, so I’m happy enough 🙂

    • Referees make mistakes. Footballers make mistakes. Coaches make mistakes.
      But there are too many pundits and Sky News needs controversy as much as it needs “hard news” and there a ready supply of ex-footballers, ex-managers and increasingly ex-referees who are always happy to supply a quote.
      A controversial quote enhances their market value the next time Sky comes calling.
      Sky have already set the scene for tonight.

  4. hoboroad says:

    I notice one of those to leap to Clattenburgs defence is Jeff Winter. Who was recently questioned by Scottish police about sectarian remarks on his own blog following a Old Firm match.

    • I didnt know about that…but Winter, Gallagher and Poll are all part of the “rent-a-quote” ex referees………Gallagher seems to have a fairly “unofficial official” role.

  5. hoboroad says:

    Green is a clown of the first order.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s