Slugger O’Toole: Fealty Hits Back

It has been pretty obvious for a while that Mick Fealty at Slugger O’Toole has been lowering the bar for censure for those who dont toe the party line or those he just doesnt like….I hope I am in both those categories.

So oddly tonght……he has done me for “trolling” for my observation that a homicidal attack on the Parti Quebecois was how “reactionaries” react. I would have thought it was pretty obvious that reactionaries such as James Earl Ray murdered Martin Luther King. Also pretty obvious that reactionaries in Norn Iron reacted homicidal fashion towards nationalist civil righters.

So how on earth can it be “a cheap shop” as the peerless Mick puts it to say that this is how unionist reactionaries in Canada react?

Well the clue is in the word “nationalist”. It would of course be no problem to point out that James Earl Ray was a reactionary who murdered Martin Luther King. Thats quite properly standard “decent” fare.

Of course….Parti Quebecquois is a nationalist Party …..which means a unionist website like Slugger can sanction anyone who points out that murder is how (unionist) reactionaries react to nationalist advancement.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Slugger O’Toole: Fealty Hits Back

  1. Anon Anon Anon's avatar Anon Anon Anon says:

    You have them rattled and they hate your guts. You should be careful they will eventually boot you off the site. Good luck. I don’t like being anonymous but I think you know who I am.

    • Thank you. Coming from you that means a lot. But I think you probably over-state it. At worst, I irritate them.
      Mick is certainly getting desperate as he clearly lowered the bar to define my comment as “trolling” and it would obviously be too much to expect him to be even-handed. Nor should he be….his site, his rules.
      His options are basically to lower the bar further but I have hardly “played the man” as often as he (the referee has) so further yellow cards may or may not be likely.
      I am not sure of any basis for banning me from the site because of things I have written about Slugger on here…Facebook, San Marcos or Politics IE, or Twitter. Unless of course a charge of “bringing Slugger into Disrepute” is invented.
      But I emphasise, I couldnt care less. I have long lost respect for Slugger O’Toole and they are doing a much better job of undermining the message board than I am.

    • Oops….almost forgot. The point (unpublished) that you made about retribution is understood.

  2. football cliches's avatar football cliches says:

    Oh deary me! How does he know what ‘trolling’ is? I suspect he may some first hand experience, if the Pie thread was anything to go by…

    No FJH, that is tragically funny how bitchy he’s gotten, granted I would be in foul form if my key demographic were getting a hiding in the press.

Leave a reply to football cliches Cancel reply