The Fitzjames Horse Match Attax Stormont Assembly Collection

As Slugger O’Toole is recommending we follow Hashtag Politics on Twitter and invites us to play Fantasy Politics, I have decided to produce a series of Match Attax-style political cards.

It is….you will agree…the next logical step.

image

Initially there will be 108 standard Assembly MLA cards, 18 Westminster MP “Gold” cards and 20 Youth cards. They will be sold in Easons (five for 50 pence). Duplicates will be traded between Politics Students in the playground at the University of Ulster.

It will provide hours of fun as students say “I will swap Máirtin Ó Muilleoir for Edwin Poots” and ” I will give you David Ford and Stephen Farry for Mark Durkan”.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

SDLP Conference: “Do We Really Care?”

I am only approaching my 63rd birthday so I dont suppose I am old enough to attend this Conference. But I might get hold of some false ID and blag my way in.

image

Hopefully, several of the SDLP Election candidates will be there. Maybe David McCann, Deputy Editor of Slugger O’Toole will be there, playing Fantasy Politics on Twitter.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Fantasy Executive

David McCann, the Deputy Editor of Slugger O’Toole is now advocating Fantasy Politics. He has invited his readers to put together a “fantasy” Norn Iron Executive. There is a certain logic to this. David McCann has already advocated following the Election Campaign on Twitter.

Politics is not a spectator sport. A football match cannot be watched on Teletext.

Still it cant be that hard to pick eight people that Slugger O’Toole would like to see in the Executive.

Quintin, Allan, Trevor, Robin, Patrick, Dominic, Andy and Malachi. (Gerry, Ian and Nicholas possibly).

That was easy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Nathan Bedford Forrest And Raymond McCreesh

Conflict Resolution is a terrible thing. As I have always said, the best way to resolve a conflict is to have one side completely destroy the other. It is not exactly a moral stance. But the alternative …resolving a dispute by negotiation and attributing victory and defeat is not exactly a very satisfactory way to go about things.

In 1945, Nazi Germany was defeated. Crushed. The most complete form of Conflict Resolution. Nazis were taken off to be executed, imprisoned or simply re-educated in western democracy or soviet democracy. Denying the Holocaust or honouring Nazis is a crime (as it is in Poland, Austria and many other places which witnessed the Holocaust and Hitler. In Britain, it is merely anti-social. But in modern Germany, there are no memorials to Hitler and Himmler. There are no “childrens play parks” named for Goerring and Goebbels.

Take General Benedict Arnold. There are no American cities named for him…the hero of Saratoga. There are cities named for Houston, Decatur, Lafayette and Custer. But on the Saratoga site, there is merely a nameless monument, really understood by those who understand “The Boot”. At West Point Academy, where Benedict Arnold served, he goes without a name on the list of Commanders.

For Benedict Arnold was of course a traitor to th United States of America. If you ever see a movie called “The Red Jacket”, Arnold is despised by both the American and British spies, who are the heroes of the movie. Yes, the movie was made during the Second World War when USA and Britain were allies.

Of course the United States defeated Britain in the Revolutionary War. That is Conflict Resolution. There would be monuments to Benedict Arnold all over the United States, had Benedict Arnold been on the winning side. As it is, he is vilified as a traitor. He has no glory, like General George Custer, American hero with the city of Custer in South Dakota named for him. Around the same time that Hollywood was telling the story of  Benedict Arnold in “The Red Jacket”, it was telling the story of George Custer in “They Died With Their Boots On”. No nuance there either because War against the Native American tribes ended in Victory and Defeat. And a Holocaust. That is Conflict Resolution.

Take the War Between The States. Or if you prefer the American Civil War. Or if you prefer, the War of Northern Aggression. Pretty complete Conflict Resolution at Appomattox in April 1865. Victory. Defeat. Heroes (Lincoln, Grant, Sherman). Traitors (Davis, Lee, Stuart). Well….not quite. The attempt at reconstructing Southern racist society stalled and was finally given up….effectively allowing “southern society” to rule itself for a further century, slavery abolished and segregation facilitated within the United States.

Conflict Resolution was rolled back and put on hold so USA was left with effectively the less satisfactory form of Conflict Resolution which results from Stalemate.

Memorials for Confederate Veterans are in southern cities. A statue of Jefferson Davis is in the University of Texas in Austin. There are memorials and statues to Davis across the South. High Schools are named for him. As recently as 1964, a Community College in Alabama was named for him.

The Confederate Flag flies in private houses across the South. The Nazi Flag does not fly in private houses in Germany. Re-enactors carry the flag into camp-sites and on to battle fields. They will say that it is a banner that fought for “States Rights”. They will say that it is “Heritage, Not Hate”. Some might well believe it. But I would like to ask them how they feel about Mexican migration, Islam, Gun Rights etc to get a better flavour of how they might have felt about Slavery in 1861.

Take for example Nathan Bedford Forrest. Hero or Traitor? Well…with the secondary form of Conflict Resolution, it is a bit hard to tell. A slave owner and a slave trader…is hardly heroic. But to rise thru the ranks to become the best Cavalry General on either side iin the Civil War, well ….he fired on the American flag, killed American soldiers and got there fastest with the mostists….so he is kinda both. Then after the Civil War, he becomes a central figure and possibly a leader of the Ku Klux Klan in Tennessee which doesnt sound very nice at all. But then THAT Ku Klux Klan was not the worst KKK and he did leave when it all got too nasty. And before he died, he was (it is claimed) on reasonably good terms with former slaves.

Confederate Hero? American Traitor? Yet they named schools and institutions for him. They even named Forrest Gump for him. They erected statues for him and in Memphis, Tennessee there was a public park named for him. Kinda controversial in 21st century. Hate or Heritage? It was renamed to something more neutral a few years back. The right decision?

Take….Ireland. Whatever about the North, the Anglo-Irish Treaty was a form of pretty complete Conflict Resolution within the Republic of Ireland, as it became. Victory and Defeat.

The main thoroughfare in Dublin was re-named. Sackville Street becoming O’Connell Street. The railway stations, Connolly, Pearse and Heuston in Dublin and Ceannt in Galway honour executed leaders of 1916 Rising. Queenstown beccame Cobh, Kingstown became Dun Laoighre and Maryborough became Port Laoise. Queens County and Kings County (originally named for English Queen, Mary Tudor and her consort, Philip, became County Laois and County Offaly respectively. Of course there are anomolies, reflecting the History….the Dublin Horse Show is held at the “Royal Dublin Society” grounds and in 1963 thru my thoroughly nationalist Irish Christian Brothers, I got a certificate from the “Royal Irish Academy of Music”.

Gaelic Athletic Clubs (which are of course nothing to do with Government) and organised on an all-Ireland basis are routinely named for Irish heroes from the mythical to the War of Independence leading to the Treaty.  It has never been controversial in the Republic of Ireland. There is a point where “rebellion” becomes “establishment”.

If Conflict Resolution in the Republic of Ireland is mostly a “done deal” since 1922, it has not been the case in the North of Ireland, which had/has a distinct air of “unfinished business”. There was no acceptance of (unionist) Victory and (nationalist) defeat by nationalists. Therefore unionist persistence in referring to the mainly nationalist city of “Derry” as “Londonderry” or the 1960s decision to name a new city in County Armagh as “Craigavon” (named for a unionist founding father of Norn Iron” is only really appropriate in a Victory-Defeat scenario.

While the naming of GAA clubs for Irish heroes is normal in the Republic of Ireland, it offends unionists. It should not …but it does. As a community, unionists are easily offended. In Tyrone, there is Dungannon Clarkes (named for an executed 1916 Leader). In County Derry, there is Bellaghy Wolfe Tones (named for a 1798 Leader). And in County Armagh, there is Derrytrasna Sarsfields (named for 1690s Jacobite). And this is a pattern across the North. Not controversial to nationalists. Its part of our History. And even the re-naming of a club for Kevin Lynch a deceased 1981 hunger striker can be understood in the context of  Lynch being a member of the club. To unionists it is naming a club for a “terrorist”.

As the northern conflict was brought to an end in 1998 by the Good Friday Agreement, it is a mantra that nobody won and nobody lost. It has been unsatisfactorally concluded in Stalemate. Academics in the odd field of Conflict Resolution have tried to attribute Victory and Defeat. Especially as vital elements of the Agreement were never fully addressed.

Perhaps in this context the nationalist and republican Newry and Mourne District Council, feel it is right to name a childrens playground for Raymond McCreesh, a local IRA man who died on hunger strike in 1981. The move is proposed by Sinn Féin and opposed by unionists. To the embarassment of the SDLP leadership, local SDLP councillors have abstained on the issue. The likelihood is that the decision will be reviewed and reversed by the “new” larger council which comes into office next month.

At best…the decision seems insensitive. But the problem with LetsGetAlongerism in Norn Iron is that it purports to believe in “parity of esteem” but the default position is that primacy is given to the British tradition. The Irish Flag is not afforded the same respect as its British counterpart. The Irish and British anthems not accorded equal respect and the default position is that a way must be found to facilitate Orange parades rather than residents who oppose the sectarian nature of the institution.

But what has this got to do with General Nathan Bedford Forrest of the Confederate States of America and Newry, County Down.

Well….John Mitchel Square is a very small square in Newry, County Down. He was an Irish patriot who was sent into exile to Australia and made his way to the United States, prior to the outbreak of the American Civil War. So far…so predictable. But on the outbreak of the War, Mitchel advocated for the Confederacy, supported slavery and was a critic of the “moderate” President Jefferson Davis. He was at least as racist as Nathan Bedford Forrest. He returned to Ireland after the war, became an agent for the Fenians and ended his days in Newry.

And in Newry, they build a statue to John Mitchel. AND a GAA Club, Newry Mitchels is named for him. Named for an outspoken racist. In fairness in the late nineteeth century, few would really have scrutinised the discepancy. But in 2015, we should maybe wonder if John Mitchel Square is more or less appropriate than Raymond McCreesh Playground.

Nor does anyone seem to notice that the City of Craigavon carries a name of a unionist politician that is offensive to me….a resident (albeit one who never shows the name on any form of address).

But it could be worse. There is a Jefferson Davis County in Mississippi. There is a Nathan Bedford Forrest in Mississippi. And there is a Mitchell (sic) County in Iowa….named for our very own racist, John Mitchel (sic).

As a footnote….in our Assembly, Tom Elliott MLA (UUP) will be tabling a motion to prohibit the naming of public buildings/spaces for “convicted terrorists”. The SDLP is minded to support this, with the proviso that it is tweaked to be more even-handed.

But meanwhile….next week, I have an appointment at CRAIGAVON Hospital.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Europe” Just Got Closer

Well here is an odd thing. Every night before going to bed, I check the Blog statistics. It is not so much the numbers as the places. The “tags” influence readership. For example, when I was blogabout Greece, I got some visits from Greece or when I blog about President Obama, I get more visits than usual from USA.

It is also the case that my local readership sees my insane ramblings before the Americans, who dont really show up until the time, I am getting up.

Anyhow, last night was the first appearance of “The European Union” in statistics. Oddly the DisUnited Kingdom figures (which includes Norn Iron) are still shown seperately. It is actually a pity that the European figues are no longer broken down to individual countries. For some peculiar reason, “Keeping An Eye On The Czar of Russia” is popular in Sweden. And strangely, I have a fan in Slovenia.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Constituency Offices…#23 Trevor Lunn MLA

I came across the office of Trevor Lunn MLA (Alliance, Lagan Valley) by accident. It is in a side street , near the train station in Lisburn.

image It is quite spacious and when I passed by (Thursday last week at lunch time), Lunn was the only person in the office.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Constituency Offices…#22 Jim Shannon MP.

Jim Shannon MP (DUP) for Strangford, must be one of the luckiest men in politics. He is the only beneficiary of the scandal which forced party colleague, Iris Robinson to give up politics in 2010.There is no way that the backbench MLA thought he would ever become a Member of Parliament.

image

Jim Shannon’s office is in the main street (Regent Street?) in Newtownards.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Jimmy Saville: There Must Be A Hell

As Gary Glitter (70) joins other 1970s icons in prison, there must be a fair chance that he will not survive the sixteen years, even with remission. Few will care.

But the biggest fish got away. Jimmy Saville. He died three years ago and actually held in high esteem. But it was only a matter of months after he lay in state in a gold coffin, that his legacy was re-written. The catalogue of his crimes is sickening. From Necrophilia to Paedophilia….to abusing sixty patients, old, young and disabled…in just one hospital. His celebrity gave him access to other vulnerable girls and women in other hospitals and living in and even holding the keys to rooms in Britains most secure mental hospital.

If he was alive today…and clearly he isnt….and charged with even a handful of these offences…then at almost 90 years of age, he would die in prison.

It has always been the case that The Rich, The Powerful and The Famous have used their money, power and fame to impress the people who are impressed by Money, Power and Fame. There were and are willing women. And the growing permissiveness from the mid1960s allowed a lot of men to “fill their boots”.

Of course, the line is crossed when Sex is predatory and not consensual.

So how did Jimmy Saville get away with it?….EASILY.

Too easily. In the 1950s and 1960s Saville was a Dance Hall DJ in the north of England. By his own accounts, he had relationships with young women. But his accounts never said just “how young”. He talks about knowing a lot about underworld activity and the darker side of Dance Hall Culture in northern towns like Leeds and Manchester. He maybe overstates the case that he was handy in fights and had a good relationship with the Police.

To some extent, Saville was made for the 1960s……he is rooted in the 1950s but as Manford says that’s when the 1960s actually began…..the 1950s. So he was ideally placed to take advantage of the explosion in “pop music”. With British radio in the control of the BBC, Saville was one of those DJs who broadcast …at least technically from the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. In actual fact the radio shows were taped in London an flown to Luxembourg, to get around broadcasting restrictions, which included all night music and  programmes, directly sponsored by record companies. And broadcast into millions of homes……..and my bedroom, where I was an avid 12 year old listener.

Of course, it was a culture of cash stuffed in brown envelopes and a chance for DJs like Saville to exploit their fame. And perhaps develop a sense of Entitlement.

Maybe that’s the thing that comes too easily with Money, Power and Fame…a sense of Entitlement.

So when BBC at the height of Beatlemania developed its first real “pop music” TV programme “Top of the Pops”, Saville was the obvious choice to host the first one and to be one of the four who presented the first few years on a monthly rota.

It is now hard to describe just how popular Jimmy Saville was in the late 1960s and early 1970s. He LOOKED different, his long (dyed)  blonde hair, his trademark cigar and his sense of dress…unlike the other three stereotypical BBC men, Pete Murray, Alan Freeman and David Jacobs….suited and with posh BBC accents (Freeman was actually Australian). So Saville was the one that young people identified with.

It is impossible also to talk about Saville without noting his sense of showmanship. He was a very fit man….he wrestled. And he cycled and ran marathons, often for charity. But unknown to his fans (but surely known by charities), he was a firm believer in Charity “beginning at home”. Maybe the organisers of marathons simply accepted the fact that he brought in so much money for them that he was entitled to some unofficial commission. He was not shy about his charity work. Indeed he was often seen publicly working for his local hospital in Leeds. It would (after his death) be revealed, proven and accepted that he used his position as a volunteer hospital porter and celebrity to abuse patients.

Yet there is a contradiction. Saville was a Catholic.And boasted of his more acceptable and legal excesses.He liked young women, which seemed ok as young women liked him. And yet there was something about him that suggested a “religious” medieval nobleman, who balanced his sexual appetites with alms-giving to buy his way into Heaven.

Later Jimmy Saville would be chief fundraiser for Stoke Mandeville Hospital, a centre for people who suffered loss of mobility. Certainly his demeanour suggested a man who cared deeply for the patients, even if he came across as an eccentric, embarrassing, over-familiar but good natured uncle.

And yet as with his local hospital in Leeds, he used his position to abuse patients. He even had his own apartment in the Nurses Home. When footage is shown of him leering about this, it seems creepy in 2015 and yet, the best part of forty years ago, it seems like a (then) acceptable Benny Hill-type middle aged man. Of course, I don’t think anyone doubted that he was sexually active. As a man of Wealth, Power and Fame, it would be normal in the context of consensual sex.

But there were suggestions made to Management that he was a “sex pest”. Suggestions that were ignored. And Saville was still on the rise as Britains best loved celebrity.

Advertising acmpaigns such as wearing seat belts …”Clunk Click Every Trip”emphasised this. At worst, he was eccentric. Maybe he himself realised that he was just too old to be a Disc Jockey and so began a new career as a TV personality. The BBC built a long running show ” Jim ‘ll Fix It” around him. The premise of the show was that people (often children and often ill) would write to him to arrange some “dream” to meet a singer, group, football team….or even Prime Minister. Margaret Thatcher.

Yet Saville continued to abuse. Children were invited to BBC studios. They were abused. The BBC is curiously guarded. Some ex programme makers claim that “everyone knew about Saville”. Others claim “nobody knew” and there is a third narrative that “we all knew the rumours”.

Yet Saville went from strength to strength. Now a friend of Margaret Thatcher, he was appointed by the Conservatives to Broadmoor (Criminal Psychiatric Hospital). His exact role is hard to say, other than he had an apartment on the site and had keys in an “access all areas” way to some very disturbed people. Inevitably Women were abused.

Saville ….the eccentric do-gooder had reached the position of being a British National Treasure. Friend of Royalty, he was made “Sir Jimmy Saville”. He was also a Papal Knight, honoured by the Catholic Church. Public acknowledgements by his Country and his Church that he was a “good man”.

I find that unbelievable. In Leeds, Stoke Mandeville, BBC, Broadmoor and in his dance hall DJ days, he left a legacy of abuse…complaint, investigation by statutory bodies, including the Police.

I find it odd that nobody in British Intelligence did not inform people close to Thatcher that befriending Saville was a very  bad idea for a Prime Minister. It beggars belief that the Honours Committee in the British Cabinet Office were unaware of the true nature of Saville and and recommended him for a knighthood.

What we do know is that a deceased member of Margaret Thatchers inner circle was a paedophile. We know of persistent speculation about a high level political paedophile ring. Did the Security Services know?

Arguably the Catholic Church has a better Intelligence Service than the British Government. Even if Jimmy Saville conned his confessors, it  must have been the case that bishops got feedback from parishioners and other sources that Saville was not the kinda man who deserved to be a poster boy for Catholicism as a “Knight of St Gregory”. There must surely have been more than one “Student Nurse Mary Anne Murphy from Ballydehob, County Cork” to report upwardly that Jimmy Saville was a “durty aul bastard”.

So Police, BBC, Health Authorities. Government, Church and Newspapers (journalists now claim that they knew but were too afraid of legal action)  all knew. Can there be any doubt?

Of course from the 1990s to his death in 2011, Saville was an elderly relic, rarely on TV. Curiously in one of his last appearances, he told interviewer Louis Theroux about the rumours around him. Seemingly it was an unsolicited comment.

It is largely believed that Jimmy Saville “hid in public view”. That he had actually for five decades made his own Paedophile and Rapist status obvious. And that the people who should have spotted it, missed it. I do not believe this. Saville was either very lucky or he was protected.

Within days of his death, the truth about Jimmy Saville was known. And the truth about other abusers at the BBC such as Stuart Hall and Rolf Harris. Both in their 80s, they were sent to prison for sex crimes. At least one (Harris) is still in prison. And as 1970s star, Gary Glitter (in his 70s) begins sixteen years in prison, it is obvious that Jimmy Saville “should” be in jail.

He is dead. Yet he is not around to see that his legacy is a shameful one. His victims deserve better.

Has he escaped Justice? Surely he is the best advert for the existence of Hell. Are our lives without account? Can the fate of a righteous person be the same as an evil person? Does Dietrich Bonhoeffer have the same (non existent) after-life as Adolf Hitler?

I don’t want to believe  that. Surely Jimmy Saville is in Hell.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Jihadi John

So the butcher has a name. Jihadi John is Mohammed Emwazi. He is 27 years old and from West London. Somehow, it is more shocking that he has a name and a face.

I do not think Greater England understands the full implications. There is a significant minority of British Muslims who are at hostile to British values. The average Briton cannot understand that a second or third generation British Muslim, who LOOKS westernised, would go off to the Middle East, prepared to kill fellow Britons in a gruesome way.

Nor can the average Briton understand how three teenage Muslim girls as westernised as any Chelsea fan with a teddy bear, can go off to the Middle East to either fight for ISIL or to be brides of ISIL warriors. ISIL are preaching an agenda which is anti-woman.

These girls have been “trafficked” out of London in much the same way that thousands of teenage girls have been “trafficked” into London. It is a concern. Whatever about their confused intentions, when they boarded the plane for Turkey, they are at this point in time “victims”At some future point, they might well come back to Gatwick airport, in two years…or five years….or ten years…and they will be “terrorists”.

Mohammed Emwazi and the three girls have very publicly repudiated British values. “British values” is one of those elastic terms. Hard to describe them. Likewise my own “Irish values” are nebulous. I dont suppose my “Irish values” are so much different from “British values”….or “Norwegian values” or “Norwegian values”. Crucially my sense of “decency”…and we all think we are “decent” ….dont include imperialism. And it seems to me that British values include either support for, indifference to or shame about the Imperial History and Imperial Legacy.

So the Establishment are confused about a Response. A new pressure group “Cage”, a human rights group exceeds its brief. It blames British Intelligence for radicalising Emwazi and turning him into a serial killer. There is no nuance. It is as crass as blaming Americans for 9/11. And yet these comments will find an audience in some British mosques.

It is a mess….there is no easy way out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Catholic Church…On Wrong Side Of History…Again?

Some speculation that the Catholic Bishops in Norn Iron are angry about the Conscience Clause and a general anti-Religion atmosphere in Norn Iron.

I have always sought to seperate Religion from Politics. I do not like mentioning Religion (a personal matter) with Politics (a public matter).

In simple terms, I am a Catholic…specifically an Irish Catholic.

And as we all know, the Catholic Church is usually on the wrong side of History. Open a first History Text Book….aged 11…even a Catholic -orientated text book in an Irish Christian Brothers School and with three strands of History (English,European and Irish) in the same book beginning with Tudor Dynasty and its pretty clear. The Reformation and its effects dominate.

Of course the Reformation in Europe and in England are different. To an 11 year old Catholic boy, Martin Luther had a point. Priests selling Indulgences, charging cash for sight of the “True Cross” or the bones of a “saint”…..all a bit tacky and clearly in need of Reform. And of course Luther championed Education against Ignorance. Of course we were taught that Luther went too far…there cant be any compromise on the Great Issues of Transubstantiation and the rest….Or so we were told.

England was different. A king, Henry VIII, who believed himself to be Catholic, conflicting advice from Catholics like More and Protestants like Cranmer…conflicting continental influences…and courtiers trying to find a way thru Principle, the Demands of a male heir, greed (the confiscation of the monasteries etc). Remember that to us, Thomas More, Bishop John Fisher who did not sign up to Henry’s Act of Supremacy were martyrs and saints of our Church.

We sang hymns to celebrate them “Faith of our fathers living still in spite of dungeon fire and sword”.

Of course Ireland as always is different. The Anglo-Irish nobility descended from the Normans stayed Catholic and had common cause with the Gaelic Chieftains. The occupation of Ireland by the English …and English dominion over Ireland…is actually a Papal Decree, issued three hundred years before the Reformation. The validity of such a decree issued by the only English Pope is obviously nonsensical….but English Catholics, even today regard the Irish (Catholics) as lesser beings.

Of course 11 year old boys never really grasp the contradiction. Intelligent people “should” be Protestants. Certainly Protestant and Unionist orthodoxy in Norn Iron holds that Catholics are at best to be pitied because we are all under the influence of Superstition and at worst to be suspected as being Papists who owe allegiance to Rome.

And post-1648 and Westphalia, Europe settles down to good sensible Swedes and Danes and Prussians being Protestant. And those feckless, superstitious Italians and Spanish and French being Catholic. Protestantism perceived as intellectual and Catholicism perceived as anti-intellectual. Call Mr Gallileo as the first witness.

Take the Williamite-Jacobite Wars. Sensible Protestant William of Orange and King George and sensible Anglo-Dutch-Hanoverians and Stupid King James and Bonnie Prince Charlie and stupid French and savage Irish and Highland Scots. A Glorious Revolution and Divine Right of Kings. Again, the wrong side of History. But heres the thing….the blood spilled at Aughrim, Fontenoy, Culloden was OUR blood. Our ancestors made no logical choice, other than defence of what little we had.

Over the last fifteen years or so, I have encountered many and even met a few modern Jacobites (sic). I am persona non grata for despite being interested in Jacobite History, I am a Republican and a …..follower of Satan. You might think that depicting me as a Satanist is a bit harsh but there is a certain logic. Lucifer rebelled against GOD. He was the first Republican. Republicans rebelling against Kings appointed by GOD are bound for Hell….An alternative view is that modern Jacobites are mad.

But turn that History text book page.  The French Revolution. 1789.On the wrong side of History and even the Enlightenment. As bishops and priests went to the guillotine we might be forgiven for looking on them as martyrs but….overthrowing despots seems a legitimate Christian activity.

Of course the French Revolution was the point where the British panicked. Revolution across the Channel and having already happened in North America. And fearing Ireland, the British open a Seminary at Maynooth (1795) and relax anti-Catholic Laws. It doesnt stop the (republican) Rebellion of 1798. It doesnt stop the fact that the Wexford rebels were led by Catholic priests. But it does keep the Catholic Hierarchy allied to the British. The wrong side again..

And yet in the 19th century, Irish nationalism and the Irish Catholic Church joined together. An independent Ireland would necessarily be mostly Catholic. The Church was active in commemorating the centenary of the 1798 Rebellion. The Rebels had fought for their altar and their hearth. But it is the nature of The Catholic Church to distrust Republicanism and even Democracy. It is the nature of Nationalism to believe in the Sovreignty of the State. And the nature of Republicanism to believe in the primacy of the Republic.I was born into a Norn Iron where Catholics were discriminated against and the Church seen as a protector as well as a co-victim. Church attendance high at maybe 85 per cent.

Yet the Troubles that started in 1969 was a wedge between the Catholic Church and the people in the pews. Understandably the Church opposed violence…and whether in the general or the specific, condemning violence from the altar, often led to walk outs. In my experience, I never saw a “massive” walk out. It was usually pretty discrete. And I can only remember one really nasty shouting match. But it was evident that people were staying away.

Of course global Catholicism was having problems. I can find mitigation in the position of Pope Pius XII in his dealings with Nazi Germany but I can find no mitigation in Franco’s Spain. And of course moral issues like Contraception showed the Church behind the views of its own members.

I hate to see the Catholic Church being defined on the single issue of Abortion. It is more nuanced than  the combatants would have us believe. It is illegal in Ireland and the “Irish solution to an Irish problem” …..if you want an abortion, go to England …..is no longer tenable.

In May this year, the Republic will vote in a Referendum on same-sex marriage. The Church will ritually oppose it but its a generational argument that is already lost by the Church. Abortion will be introduced within another generation. It is more problematic.

But the Abortion Debate DID drive a wedge between the British Labour Party and BritishCatholics. The Church was of course on the wrong side of History and Feminism was on the right side of History.

I was made to feel very uncomfortable in 1983. It was the height of Thatcherism and some of her Catholic backbenchers were advocating reform of Englands liberal abortion laws. They styled themselves “Pro Life” but somehow that did not extend to protecting lives in West Belfast or Derry. Nor did it extend to standing up against nuclear weapons. Nor did their alleged “pro Life” stance extend to providing enough support for vulnerable families.

And perhaps fair to say that in a Party (Labour) committed to a “Pro-Choice” stance, Catholic Labour MPs in South Lancashire, West Scotland were not vocal enough in opposing the Party Line.

But in 1983, I was uncomfortable during a speech about Abortion at a meeting for Catholic couples, who had married the previous year. My wife was pregnant in 1983 and it was all a bit graphic. But frankly what made me most uncomfortable was my own cowardice. I wanted to talk about “nuance” about special cases such as Rape. I wanted to say that things can be OBJECTIVELY wrong (stealing) and SUBJECTIVELY right (stealing to feed a starving family). And most of all I wanted to say that I dont want anyone imposing a moral code on me. Nor do I wish to impose my moral code on anyone else.

Of course things have changed since 1983. Notably the Catholic Church has seen its influence wane. Sexual Abuse and Child Abuse Scandals and its handling of these issues have meant that Catholics no longer attend Church in the same numbers…except of course for Christenings, Marriages and Funerals (hatching, matching and despatching). And of course Catholics attend Catholic schools, which gives the Church SOME influence but significantly these schools turn out nationalists and republicans as much as they turn out Catholics.

But while Abortion wont be settled as an issue by THIS generation, the issue of Same Sex Marriage and Gay Rights is settled.

In political terms, the DUP (fundamentalist Protestant) are totally opposed to Same Sex Marriage. Sodomy, they claim is an abomination. Conscious of its Protestant backing, most but not all UUP members are against Same Sex Marriage. The Alliance Party seem ok with Same Sex Marriage although some of their Churchy or older types are against it. Sinn Féin and SDLP are in favour. Of course nothing can happen in Norn Iron unless both tribes approve.

Its something of a surprise therefore to see the Catholic Church in Norn Iron making noises of supporting DUP over the so called Conscience Clause. Lets be frank here, the DUP is a Party of anti-Catholic bigots. At best they follow the line that they hate Catholicism but love Catholics. For the Catholic Church to find common cause (which could easily be interpreted as Homophobia) with the DUP is shameful. And simply put, directing Catholic church-goers to consider voting for any unionist party would be absurd.

I myself have reservations about the civil rights implications of the Conscience Clause. And it is a ridiculous thing where common sense should prevail.

For readers unfamiliar with the Conscience Clause….it arises to deal with a situation last year. A gay man ordered a cake from a bakery. And they refused to bake it because as a Christian business, they felt it improper to bake a cake supporting same-sex relationships.

IN COMMENTS, PLEASE DONT COMMENT ON ABORTION.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments