Human Rights And Journalism (Amnesty International Event)

About one hundred people attended An Féile event at St Marys University College on the Falls Road in West Belfast. Outside a small group of protesters half heartedly gave out leaflets in support of Marian Price, the dissident republica who has been controversially sent back to prison.

A Panel Discussion…featuring Chris Moore (UTV) the campaigning journalist best known for his stories on disgraced paedophile priest Brendan Smyth…..Mandy McAuley from BBC Spotlight….Steven McCaffery from the Press Association. The event was chaired by Paddy Corrigan of Amnesty International and hosted by Gráinne Teggart, also from Amnesty.

 After an introduction from Gráinne, paying tribute to journalists who had exposed Human Rights violations around the world….even sacricing their lives, the Panel introduced themselves. Chris Moore (wearing the white shirt in the photograph and sitting next to Chair Paddy Corrigan) is a forty year veteran of newspapers and television news. Best known for the Catholic Church paedophile stories. I admit to not really liking Chris Moore very much……I reserve the right to dislike people I have never met. He just seems a little too anxious to “get” the Catholic Church. And just a little too pleased with himself for so doing.

Steven McCaffery, to Paddy Corrigan’s right has just left the Press association to work with a digital media company. He spoke movingly of involvement with victims and how victims were let down by Inquiries.

Mandy McAuley, a reporter with BBC Spotlight would like to get at stories which went behind the “glossiness” of Norn Iron. There should be stories about loan sharks and pimps but there is few resources. She needs whistleblowers and sources close to Sinn Féin seem to have dried up because people are relunctant to be labelled “dissident”. She also has trouble with co-operation from the Government and their Press Offices.

Chris Moore described the Leveson Inquiry as the Governments revenge for stories about politicians election expenses. An audience member asked about the credibility of a journalist working for Rupert Murdoch. Moore got a little defensive. Journalists have their “own credibility”…….er well yes Chris……but surely investigative journalists working in the same newsroom as fellow journalists who were hacking phones…….missed a great scoop…..and an abuse of Human Rights. Chris Moore has no time for celebrities or indeed the politicians who were fed from Murdochs trough.

I suppose its a question of proportionality. Hugh Grant is a movie star and not a baby in Assad’s Syria but London journalists are not fearless investigative journalists exposing Human Rights violations in a war zone. London journalists are more likely to abuse Human Rights than expose Human Rights violations. They certainly wont rush to expose violations in their own newsrooms.

Interestingly another speaker from the floor…..who prefaced his point by stating is he an athiest wondered whether the pendulum had swung too far against the Catholic Church. This tends to support my own view that Chris Moore is at least as interested in getting the Catholic Church than he is interested in exposing paedophiles and protecting children. Certainly the shabby reporting on RTE about an alleged priestrapist which turned out to be completely false suggests there is an agenda at work. In fairness another audience member (a Catholic) suggested that we had only seen 10% sic) of the abuse. More would come out.

Nelson McCausland…..well his ears must have been burning…..he is a figure of ridicule to the kind of people (like myself) who would attend an Amnesty event and mere mention of his name was enough to induce some sniggers.
The notion that journalists need to regulated/licensed (like doctors) is a reasonable enough premise to reasonable people…..at least worthy of discussion…… but the spectre of regulation from the Department of Culture Arts and Leisure……dubbed the “Nelson McCausland Register of Certified Journalists” was enough to let the journalists off the hook on that one. It should be pointed out that is not actually the Ministry that McCausland holds.
Slightly annoyed by just one thing. I picked up on the friction between journalist and press officer and asked a question…..noting that many press officers were trained journalists. Press officers are “poachers turned gamekeepers” and  “todays journalists were tomorrows press officers”. I asked is there a point where the ethical training of investigative journalists becomes the ethical training of a civil service press officer.
Although Paddy Corrigan (who was excellent in the Chair) made a glib remark to the panel “thats your future” …….he did not include my point in his round up of questions to the panel.
One audience member raised Marian Price. Initially Paddy Corrigan seemed to suggest “Ill talk to you later about this”….he did actually answer this later in the session……it was along the lines of Amnesty has a good record in dealing with this……”
My own recollection from the early 1970s was that Amnesty was a bit useless….in Norn Iron. My understanding was/is that Amnesty tends to prefer to be “international” and not get involved in their own “national jurisdictions”. Perhaps that is changed or perhaps Norn Iron 2012 is not Norn Iron 1972.

A good event…..well organised. Two hours sounds long…..but I dont think it was. There was excellent audience participation.

Many thanks to Gráinne Teggart who notified me of the event.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Human Rights And Journalism (Amnesty International Event)

  1. amy's avatar amy says:

    I enjoyed following your Leveson commentary. It is such a complex situation regarding regulating the media. Legislation of course means a propaganda state. My B.A. was in Journalism when I had no idea that social science research was the way to go and I have nothing positive to say about my experience working at some of the smallest newspaper and television businesses. Although, this is the one area where I tend to agree with them. On the other hand, the idea that they are capable of self regulation is ridiculous.

    What is somewhat heartening are the changes and new direction in alternative media. Still biased each in its own way but much more diverse and less restricted by commercial interests.

    My MIL is a diehard nightly news gal and we watched with her tonight. There is so little there that is actually happening of news merit. She watches nightly and is always surprised when my husband asks what she thinks about this or that and it has not made it to mainstream TV news yet. The police brutality in Anaheim is only known via Internet around here. Nothing at all has been mentioned on any of the major networks.

    I gave up watching when they flashed a screen shot of one of their sources – the news aggregator Drudge! It irritates me to no end to see mainstream reporters interviewing other reporters and now they have resorted to using alternative media as their source.

    And what about this Team GB nonsense? The American commentators are driving me batty with it.

    • I usually watch CBS News but have not done so lately because Im watching Olympics. What are the American networks saying about Team GB?
      There is an over-reliance on journalists from newspapers etc appearing on TV News.
      BBC RTE UTV have an obligation to be neutral but interestingly in the Drama Series “The Newsroom” the excellent point is that “balance” can get in the way of the “Truth”.
      Fux(sic) News makes no secret of its bias (although it claims the opposite) and it is the sister news organisation to Sky News in Britain. Owned by Murdoch……a British news organisation cannot be openly one-sided although clearly Sky would like to go down that route.
      There used to be a segment at 11.30pm whe two journalists from newspapers (one on the right and one on the left) rpeviewed the next mornings papers anda “pool” of contributors was involved. This has now widened with the next mornings papers being previewed at 9.30pm, 10.30pm and 11.30pm. This might involve two journalists chosen from probably a resource of 40 or so. This “allows” Sky to be get opinions rather than news out into the public domain and the line between news and opinion is blurred.

      Leveson……was initially fun for me because I enjoyed the discomfort of journalists who have a Woodward-Bernstein self-image of their profession but the phone hackers are actually closer to reality.
      The “one lone rogue reporter line” was a line which was pedalled by every jouralist and it says little for journalistic ethics that this was widespread. And it says little for journalistic talent that nobody seemed to know that this was going on.
      I think there has to be a distinction between a “journalist” and a “tabloidist”.
      The fact that technically they belong to the same profession means that real journalists have to be seen defending their tabloid colleagues.
      The early days of Leveson were explosive and although the later modules produced damning information, it was somehow “expected”. The overall impression was that journalists (and proprietors and executives) have such poor powers of recalling important events. That seems basic to journalists.
      Also I tend to type with two fingers and ultimately writing things up every few days was exhausting.
      A couple of us tried to pool resources and time on a Leveson Blog which worked for a few weeks but ultimately there was some acrimony and the site disappeared.

Leave a reply to fitzjameshorse Cancel reply