Ian “More Parties Than Boy George” Parsley

I am pleased to announce that Ian James Parsley has not published a comment I made on his excellent Blog. Mr Parsley, who has had more Parties than Boy George, has ventured his opinion on “SDLP Unity”. The SDLP is a Party that Mr Parsley has not yet joined……and I am sure the SDLP are grateful.

I suggested that Mr Parsleys track record of membership of ….at least…..the Alliance Party and UUP has …..perhaps compromised his right to be taken seriously. Mr Parsley has made it clear he thinks this unfair.

For all his many qualities, consistency is not exactly one of them.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Parsley Is No Sage

Ian James Parsley can always be relied upon to brighten the dullest day.

His latest blog states….obviously accurately…..that the new SDLP Leader needs to ensure “SDLP unity”. What makes this observation amusing is the source.

This is the same Ian James Parsley who stood for the Alliance Party as their candidate in the European Elections in 2009. He resigned from the Alliance Party.

This would be the same Ian James Parsley who stood for the UUP in the Westminster Election of 2010. He resigned from the UUP.

Are you keeping up with this. Not easy I know. I think Mr Parsley is currently without a Party but I understand he canvassed for the Alliance Party in the Assembly Elections 2011….in six (count them!) constituencies.

It is this kinda inconsistency which ensures that he is a marginalised figure in local politics. So Mr Parsley pontificating on “party unity” is amusing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Things You Don’t See Everyday In Belfast

 Europa Hotel 5th September 2011.

Per Wikipedia, the Europa Hotel in Belfast is the Worlds most bombed hotel (38 times). It makes ya kinda proud. But …Bunny Girls?????

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Why Margaret Ritchie Will Stand Down.

At around midnight, I posted that Margaret Ritchie would not stand for the party Leadership and had already told people in South Down of her intention. I have received a comment (which I am not publishing) asking me to withdraw or justify my earlier post.

First and foremost, I would point out that for months on other websites, including a previous Blogger site, I have said that the best course of action for Ms Ritchie is to step aside. She cant win the Leadership. People within the SDLP and its broader support want a new Leader. SDLP canvassers know that in May this year she was a liability rather than an asset. People voted SDLP IN SPITE OF Margaret Ritchie, not BECAUSE of her.

In was a reasonable expectation going into the May 2011 Elections that SDLP would at least come back with sixteen seats. They came back with fourteen. As expected Joe Byrne gained a seat in West Tyrone and as expected thru boundary change Declan O’Loan lost out in North Antrim. But tragically Tommy Gallagher and Tommy Burns lost their seats in Fermanagh-South Tyrone and South Antrim. And the anticipated breakthru in Strangford never happened.

The policy of outreach to the unionist community was certainly reflected in the number of preferences the Party picked up but did not actually gain any crucial first preference votes. The Partys message was mixed. Sinn Féin do republicanism better than the SDLP and the Alliance Party do “lets get alongerism” better.

And Margaret Ritchie delivered the message badly. She was both hesitant and hectoring and simply looked lightweight. At times she was just embarrassing and at other times pathetic.

The knives were out before the votes had been counted in May. The loss of seats is compounded by the closure of constituency offices and the handing out of redundancy notices. Bad enough at any time of course but Margaret Ritchie has two jobs…MLA AND Westminster MP for South Down. Her defence of “double jobbing” was lame, to say the least.

She compounded her alienation from the Party by re-appointing Alex Attwood to the single SDLP Executive seat. Ignoring Patsy McGlone, SDLP Deputy Leader was a slap in the face to the rank and file members. This effectively made Attwood the “real” Deputy. Attwood from Ritchies “wing” of the SDLP unbalances the look of the SDLP as it marginalises the more nationalistic “wing”….and gives the impression of a Leader surrounded by a Praetorian Guard rather than embracing all shades of SDLP opinion. Ironically Ritchie chose Environment as the single SDLP portfolio…a brief that had been McGlones.

Margaret Ritchie CANT win the Leadership. Yet it is Double Jobbing that provides her with a dignified exit strategy. She can be Member of Parliament for South Down for life, confined to the relative anonymity of Westminster. She cant screw up. Resigning as a MLA on the basis that the Party Leader should be based locally, allows for a new SDLP face to be co-opted.

As things stand, she is still officially in the race. Eighteen months ago she beat Alastair McDonnell by 222 votes to 187 votes but McDonnell is himself a “double jobber” for South Belfast. He is in the race but essentially his campaign seems to be a reminder to the Party that they made a bad choice in early 2010. Patsy McGlone continues to the front runner.

Nominations for the post of Party Leader close on 16th September. Dolores Kelly has been selected by Craigavon to run as Deputy Leader. Who does this block……when the only declared Leadership runners are McGlone, McDonnell and Ritchie? Step forward Conall McDevitt.

McDevitt is a Mandelson-like figure. Coopted to the Assembly in early 2010, he effects to be more senior than he actually is…which has always irritated party members with a longer record of public service.

Eamonn Mallies “tweet” that suggests McDevitt is about to enter the Leadership race is actually an indication that Ritchie is indeed standing down. There is probably choreography involved. He wont declare himself until Ritchie officially announces that she wont run. He can therefore campaign on the basis of preserving and advancing the legacy of Margaret and the not too subtle sub text that McGlone is the knife weielding assassin and the Party should punish him as much as poor wee Margaret.

But the SDLP identifies McDevitt with Ritchie. It wont help him. He might actually stand a better chance as Deputy Leader. A Dream Ticket. But a Deputy Leadership contest makes things a little difficult for Patsy McGlone. There will as they say be channels of communication from McGlones campaign to Deputy Leadership candidates.

The SDLP would like to avoid Acrimony. And frankly there is already too much bad blood. Getting rid of a Leader is bound to create more bad blood. But ultimately Margaret Ritchie has been a  member of the SDLP all her adult life. She knows and loves the SDLP enough to do what is right…….stand down.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Margaret Ritchie Wont Stand For SDLP Leadership

Margaret Ritchie has already decided not to stand for the SDLP Leadership. She advised her Inner Circle last week…..or more likely they told her that there was no chance of winning.

Eamonn Mallie is already tweeting that Conall McDevitt will “throw his hat in the ring” and that seems to confirm that Ritchie is not running. McDevitt would only stand to represent that “wing” of SDLP.

He cannot win the Leadership. Too young. Too closely identified with SDLP failure. His real target is Deputy Leader.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Dealing With The Past……Yet Again!

The Conflict Resolutionists……….they have’nt gone away you know.

Platform for Change, the high priests of “lets get alongerism” held an event on “Dealing With the Past” in the Black Box, Hill Street, Belfast and I went along. The most public faces of Platform for Change, Trevor Ringland and Robin Wilson were in charge.

Trevor Ringland is a man I much admire. His track record is good on Victims. About forty people attended last nights event. Essentially all our local Parties are either hostile or indifferent to Dealing with the Past, so Platform for Change, which is essentially a middle of the road organisation of mostly Belfast academics which seeks re-allignment in our politics is friendly territory for Conflict Resolutionists.

I almost feel sorry for Conflict Resolutionists as they seem to be losing ground in their struggle to force us to deal with our past….on THEIR terms. The British and Irish Governments have dragged their feet on the ambiguous promise made to “victims” in the Good Friday Agreement in 1998. The Agreement is a triumph of Creative Ambiguity. It is all things to all people. Nobody realistically wants to look at it again. The five Norn Iron political parties are happy enough. The paramilitary groups dont need to be in the spotlight. Nor does the British Government. The past is the Past.

People might claim the Past has been buried alive. Perhaps. But after thirteen years of being buried alive its reasonable to assume that it is now dead. It will be a matter for Historians. The archives and records are already there. There is no point in creating an archive, which seeks the Truth, when the ex-participants and victims are still alive. Truth is not possible when there is still capacity for people to lie. Or at best there will be special pleading.

And this is the difference between Historians and Conflict Resolutionists. The latter want to influence the Future by manipulating the Past. All for the Common Good. In my view a Conflict Resolutionist  mis-uses History in the way that an Astrologist mis-uses Astronomy. It is a cod science.

Essentially Conflict Resolutionists lost the argument when the Consultative Group on the Past reported in 2008. Headed by Archbishop Robin Eames (former Anglican Archbishop of Armagh) and Dennis Bradley formerly a Derry priest), the Report outraged a lot of ordinary opinion.

By no means the only suggestion they made…..but the one taken up by Media, Political Parties as well as ordinary folks…..was the proposed payment of £30,000 to the family of every victim. To the unionist population, this meant there would be no distinction between the families of republican militaries and security forces (police and British Army) or indeed passers by or victims of sectarian murder. For ordinary people like myself, there was the feeling that we had all to some extent suffered in the Troubles and many “victims” had already been adequately (financially compensated). Reducing victimhood to a cash sum was crass.  Eames-Bradley was fatally wounded and with it any attempt to deal with the Past.

Archbishop Eames has been so wounded by the controversy that he has retreated into private life. Mr Bradley continues to peddle proposed revised versions of the Plan. Frankly the Conflict Resolutionists screwed it up for themselves.

And like Monty Pythons Parrot, there is no realistic prospect of Dealing with the Past. To mix the metaphor that (gravy) train has now left the station.

Last nights event featured a theatrical presentation by five ladies (one via video) from a group called Theatre of Witness. This is the kind of thing dismissed as “Prozac Art” by theatre director Tim Loane at the Culture After Conflict seminar in March this year. I have blogged about this. But Loane was unfair I think.

The five women……a woman in late middle age from Protestant North Belfast……a Catholic from West Belfast who was burned out from her home (age 7) by Protestant mob in 1969 and later the victim of abuse….a woman who had become an IRA volunteer in Derry in the late 1970s (also a victim of abuse)…a Derry woman (via video) abused as a young woman who joined the Police Service in 2005.

Most poignantly the fifth woman was Patricia Gillespie, a Catholic from Derry whose husband was abducted by the IRA and chained to the drivers seat of a car and told to drive to an Army checkpoint. A bomb in his car was detonated by remote control. He was blown to pieces and five soldiers from the British Army waere also killed.

Five remarkable women. Victims. Survivors. But the stories of the Troubles and their own personal journeys are entwined. We all have a story.

Everyone found these stories very moving.But the point was that these were personal reflections…often with the Troubles as a background rather than “central”.

That the women were brave, articulate and empowered was obvious but I saw no direct “evidence” that what was good for them was good for us all.Their stories were stories of ordinary women. And perhaps the shock was that the well heeled, academic audience members were “shocked”. Where have they been living all these years? Well seemingly USA, Germany and England.

I stated that there might be 400,000 people still alive who were adults during the Troubles and that we are a dying breed. Actually a person better able to judge said it was nearer 500,000 but the key point which he acknowledged was that not many in the general community are bothered about the past.
He quoted figures in confidence which he asked us not to broadcast……..

So who actually is driving this nonsense which refuses to just lie down and die. People spoke of the expense of the Truth and was it worth it…… (well of course it isnt!) and I put forward my own preference for Healing Thru Amnesia being as valid a response to dealing with the Past ….if thats what works and tinkering about with the Good Friday Agreement and risking its gains to satisfy the intellectual cravings of academics must be resisted.

Yet there is something which annoyed me. People in the Bogside Derry or indeed the unionist folks along the border areas have been screaming about injustices such as Bloody Sunday or Claudy for three decades. Last years Reports seemingly validated the relatives sense of Injustice……but it is only the “Great and the Good” who refused to recognise the obvious truth. The Truth does not need an Inquiry so that British Government Ministers or academics in Queens University can say “if only we had known about these terrible things”.

Dont try and con me with that nonsense. You knew about it. Perhaps someday in the not too distant future an expensive Inquiry will reveal the “truth” about the Ballymurphy Massacre of 1971. I lived thru it. I saw it before my eyes. I dont need an Inquiry. I dont need an expensive charade to confirm what I already know. Nor do the relatives of the eleven victims who died during those two days. They know the Truth. The Truth can be confirmed tomorrow. It really is THAT simple.

So why the call for Truth Commissions and ever more Inquiries…..into Kingsmill or Tebane… or Bloody Friday…..or Collusion?.

Simple. The big pretence is that this will make Victims feel better. But the reality is that this is to facilitate those who sat behind their doors in leafy Belfast suburbia to come to terms with the fact that they spent decades neither knowing or caring what was happening to their fellow human beings in working class areas like Catholic Ballymurphy or Protestant Shankill.

Aint that the Truth?

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“Líofa 2015″… A Campaign to Get People Fluent in Gaelic

Note : “Líofa” is the Gaelic word for “Fluent”.

There are lies, damned lies and the Norn Iron Census.
And every decade (2011 being just the latest)  I lie thru my teeth and claim that I am “liofa” (at best I am just more than liath-liofa….if indeed its even possible to be “half-fluent”.)
Indeed for the purposes of the Census, all my “clann” are “liofa”…even the ones that now live in their own homes.
Theres absolutely no point in the Norn Iron Census if you cant lie. Its a British Census so it doesnt count (so to speak).

My own experiences of Irish are a bit “iffy”. I had no choice but to send #1 son to a Gaelic speaking nursery school. (his grandparents looked after him during the day).
I was a bit concerned when I was waiting for my “mac” outside the school and got kinda chatting with another “athair” outside waiting on his “inion” kinda embarrassed myself and told him that I didnt really speak much “gaelic” and he told me that he spoke “Jailic”  (sic) having learned it at “Ollscoil Long Kesh” (where IRA prisoners were kept).
Ooops.
Of course my “mac” learned nursery rhymes with the best of them and the time arrived for him at 5 years old to go to “bunscoil” and we had an interview and they told us #1 son was brilliant.
I was kinda put off by the notion that I would have to fund raise for the school and that seemed a bit of a risk in 1989/90 (to be publicly identified with themmuns).
The attitude that if I didnt fund raise it might have an effect on #2 sons s chances of getting into the same school was a bit annoying……as much as the notion of my colleagues seeing me outside the Bank Buildings in Belfast on a wet Saturday with a collecting tin.
Indeed much later, one of my colleagues spotted a “focloir” in my drawer and said “I didnt think you were like that”.
Of course things change. Coming up to UDR or RUC roadblock I always thought it advisable to get the books off the back seat. And yet about ten years ago a RUC man went out of his way to tell me he was “ag foglamh”.
There are ups and downs with learning. Theres that “bialann” in County Donegal where I cant show my “aghaidh” due to the unfortunate incident where I ordered “nostrils” rather than “beans” for my sons.
I suppose up in Donegal they dine out on stories about people from “Béal Feirste” thinking they are fluent.

Thing is I only speak Gaelic in front of people who speak it even worse than me. Id hate to make an “amadán” of myself in front of a real Gaelic speaker.
Not that I havent tried to learn more. Even went to some night classes with a man who wore a poppy in Poppy Season and the rest of the “rang” were far too polite to notice.

So Caral Ní Chuílín the (Sinn Féin) Minister of Culture, Arts and Leisure can sign me up for Liofa 2015. It is a campaign to get one thousand people fluent by 2015.
Absolutely. No “fadhb” at all.

But actually Id make a very bad Gaelic speaker. I dont buy into the “first national language” thing. Its the “first national hypocrisy”.
I also think Douglas Hyde was a bit of a weirdo.
Ironically a few years back I stopped the car in Ballaghdereen Co Roscommon, and asked directions for the Hyde Centre at Frenchpark and the man from Ukraine didnt understand the question. The lady from Poland working in a shop did tell me.
The irony being this is the place where Dougie heard a country boy speak “English at the Market and asked him could he not speak Irish”. And he told Dougie “shure isnt it Irish Im speaking”. Dougie a local Protestant aristocrat threw himself into saving the Gaelic language from extinction.

Actually the wee “buachaill” was “ceart”. English IS an Irish language. The basic problem that Sinn Féin have with “English” is that its called “English”. Call it an Anglophonic language and they might react better.

And theres an irony there thats lost on the “Gaelic galory”.
In “English” we tend to refer to the “English language” and the “Irish language”.
Yet in Gaelic an English person is “Sasanach” and the language “Béarla”. And it is “Éireannach” and “Gaeilige”.

By the way my “Gaelic” spelling is worse than my “English” spelling and Im too lazy to look up spellings.

So I should probably sign up to “Liofa 2015″ just to remove the horrible “peaca” of lying to British census people. And I live in daily “eagla” of getting a phone call from them asking me to say something in Gaelic. Plan B is to mention that I am deaf……but I forget how many deaf people I declared in the family.

“Lets Get Alongerists” and of course Unionists claim that the Gaelic language is divisive. It divides our homogenous society (yeah right) by creating another barrier.
Is it Divisive?
Couldnt care less to be honest.
People who use the word “divisive” say it was a “bad thing” but no more than the Twelfth, Poppy Day, GAA, Unionist, Republican.

If we lose or submerge our national identities, then we the nationalists lose more than the unionists. Ultimately the homogenous society is not “value free”. It would be more British than Irish and those that seek to make us homogenous want to take away the constitutional position of Norn Iron as a live issue so that it will die out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

A Little Nonsense Now And Then……

A Little Nonsense Now and Then is Cherished by the Wisest Men…..

As a Very Wise Man (no sniggering!), I cherish a little Nonsense. My two forms of Cherished Nonsense are Internet Blogging and Collecting Toy Soldiers.

  

Collecting plastic toy soldiers sounds a very childish hobby for an adult male.And what can I say?….it is!! But it is also good fun and relaxing and hey I enjoy it.

Like most boys of my age,I played with toy soldiers and my favourite figures were “Robin Hood” figures and “US Cavalry” figures.I dont suppose it was coincidence that my two very favourite TV shows were “The Adventures of Robin Hood”(starring the great Richard Greene) and a little remembered western called “Boots And Saddles”.

So in my house in Belfast,Ireland in the early 1960s was a wooden “Fort Laramie” which was inhabited by a strange collection of military figures,mostly U S Cavalrymen,some Civil War figures including Confederate deserters,and occasional refugees from Sherwood Forest,the French Foreign Legion and even some Astronauts caught in a bizarre Time Tunnel.

I guess our living room floor was no different from thousands or millions accross the world.Some time around 1967,the fort and its strange garrison was gifted to a younger cousin but still very occasionally when visiting my mothers house,I came accross the odd much played with plastic figure.Or more likely at swap meets etc,I see a Lone Star or Crescent figure,or cereal box figure…a brother-in-arms of my old multi-national,multi-ethnic Brigade of Heroes.

In the mid 1980s,I found myself happily married to a beautiful lady who has given me two wonderful sons and the excuse to play with toy soldiers again.When my sons reached “toy soldier age”,I was initially disappointed to find that the plastic warriors of my generation were now overlooked in favour of more directly TV merchandised toys such as the Ninja Turtles or the new Dungeons and Dragons stuff. Worse,some manufacturers such as the fore-mentioned Lone Star and Crescent had disappeared.

I was however happy to see that some brave adult souls were doing their best to keep alive those gloriously happy play days of the 1950s and 1960s.

I was actively collecting plastic figures from 1986 to 1993 when we moved house(many figures were “lost in action” during the upheaval)and became active again in 2001.Many thanks to my long-suffering and patient wife who never….well very rarely…complains about model paint stains on the carpet and is very supportive of me.

I should point out that I am not a Wargamer and I am not interested in Militaria.I am however very interested in Irish history and American history.I am not a model maker or diorama maker.My interest is solely buying cheap plastic figures,painting them to my best ability and moving on to the next project.I only collect 1:32 scale.

In terms of numbers,I only have about 2,500 figures.My favourite figures are Airfix,Accurate and Timpo.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Joshua Blowing His Trumpet…..Or Tom Ekin Blowing His Own Trumpet.

Belfast City Council last night.

Tom Ekin of the Alliance Party proposed the demolition of Belfasts “Peace” Walls. There are several of these Walls in Belfast dividing Protestant/Unionist areas from Catholic/Nationalist areas. Working class areas. In the language of the British Army, these are “interfaces” where the removal of the walls would create tension and almost certainly violence.

They are for many…….a horrible admission….that we can never live together or be a single homogenous community. For me they are a guarantee of security and an admission that we are divided and equal communities. On one side of the Wall, people live as Irish people. On the other side people live as British people.

Indeed the re-development of Belfast over the past forty years has actually factored in community division and actually instituted the divisions, whether with shoppong malls, parks, open spaces, and major thoroughfares.

Ironically earlier this summer we commemorated the fiftieth anniversary of the Berlin Wall and some people (I feel wrongly) have a sense of shame that Belfast is now the only city in Western Europe which has a wall to keep its citizens apart. Now it must be remembered that inevitably these walls exist in working class communities but I would suggest that Belfast just like any other major city in the world has (invisible) barriers which divide people.

Councillor Tom Ekin (whose upmarket address is on the Belfast City Council website) does not live at an interface. And I dont think there are any in his Balmoral Ward. And thats the odd thing about people who advocate bringing the Walls down. They dont live in ghettoes. But are these upper middle class and exclusive areas as much a ghetto as the places where “visible” walls exist. A public sector housing estate to re-house low earners might bring a trail of Balmoral voters to see Councillor Ekin to do something about the effect on the market values of their homes.

It is argued that these Walls are not “natural”. Alas in Human History boundaries are often natural.The four miles of fields which seperate the County Tyrone villages of Ardboe (staunchly republican) from Coagh (staunchly loyalist) are natural. Likewise in other counties Aghagallon (republican) is two miles from Aghalee (loyalist) and Maghery (republican) is three miles from The Birches (loyalist).

There are scores of villages which are the same. It would be difficult (or impossible) to live openly as a British person in Crossmaglen, County Armagh. And equally difficult to live as a Irish person in Bushmills, County Antrim.

The great and the good in the “Golden Halo” of the lucrative Community Relations Industry are inevitably upper middle class who just as inevitably believe that they know whats good for folks in working class communities. If the Middle Class are entitled to worry about their property values so too are the Working Class. Nothing lowers property values quicker than a petrol bomb thru your window.

I live in a small village. It is 98% Nationalist. I can live like an Irish citizen without fear of insult or injury or worse. And more importantly I dont have to compromise my sense of Irishness to live here. No Walls. No Barriers. And the nearest unionist is about four miles away and out of sight.

Tom Ekin is of course talking thru his hat.
Peace Walls (sic) are very bad things and it naturally behoves councillors to make totemic calls for their removal. But thats all it is…..lip service.
Nothing short of Joshua’s trumpet will bring the Walls down and Ekin knows it.
And if the Walls ever do come down (and it will be a blow to the Befast Tourism Industry as the Tourists love them,I look forward to Ekin handing the keys of his house over to a resident who currently lives in Cupar Street or Bombay Street (where the above pic was taken in 2009)……and Ekin will move there.
Problem solved.
Of course that would be more than lip service.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Conflict Resolutionists…They Havent Gone Away You Know.

It is my my view that Conflict Resolution is to History  what Astrology is to Astronomy.

In other words Conflict Resolution is a “cod” academic discipline which is made for academics by academics. It has no value whatsoever.

Despite the best efforts of Conflict Resolutionists to help us deal with the Past, the people of Norn Iron of all traditions would rather just move on. For the Conflict Resolutionist however, there is no “move on” option. They just wont be politely told to “Go Away”. But rather like a persistant “cold caller” from an Insurance Company or a kitchen manufacturer, there comes a time when it is permissable to be impolite and rather forceful.

It is increasingly obvious that people..ordinary people ……have become more irritated with the persistance of the Conflict Resolutionists and they Conflict Resolutionists seem stunned and even hurt at the hostile response.

They seem particuarly concerned at “anonymous” attacks on message boards. There is of course a difference between “anonymous posting” and having a nom de guerre. I am not a public figure and fully entitled to use a nom de guerre. The only stipulation is that I remain in a single identity and post a consistent viewpoint on the various platforms in which I engage.
I think my view carries as much or as little weight as anyone else.

If “quality of discourse” is the test then maybe the Internet Blog is the wrong area in which to carry out the Discourse.
Academic Discourse has a different framework and many bloggers would find it alien.
While I personally deplore offensive language on message boards (I stand by my own record) I realise that the Blogosphere is a vulgar way to express ideas. But I have to live with it.

Peace is NOT a concept to be debated.
It is simply to be accepted.
For most of us…..thats enough.
And our politicians are to be congratulated on avoiding a “debate”.
The notion that only the “helpful” views that agree with the Conflict Resolution blueprint are somehow acceptable is risible

.Conflict Resolution is an academic discipline that has been created by academics purely for the benefit of other academics.
The least important people in the whole process are “real people” who may be dismissed as being “unhelpful” if they disagree with conflict resolutionists.
As I have said before there is no real benefit in making an issue of the Peace Process.
Clearly Republican, Unionist and Liberal dissidents and dysentery are dangerous people.
Unwittingly perhaps…..conflict resolutionists are dangerous.
I dont deny that Conflict Resolution is “interesting” in a purely academic way.
Many courses as advertised on university notice boards are tempting …..but by no stretch of the imagination can these courses be described as “useful”.

In the academic world, journalistic world……its about the credibility that can attach to “who/what” we are. The source.
Thus the Professor of International Relations at Harvard might carry more weight than the “ordinary Joe” and thats the real irritation.
You just cant tell..
Nobody would care if the contributions of “Ordinary Joe….or er Ordinary Josephine”  were nonsensical.

But if the contributions of the “Ordinary Joe” appear well informed and well argued, then that presents a dilemna for those who are brought up in disciplines respecting “source”

In the academic world…A person with A levels carries more credibility than a person who has O Levels.
A person with a MA is more credible than a BA.
A PhD more credible again.
And so on.
Sooner or later every first year Uni student comes accross a tutor…….who wants more footnotes and can be dismissive if you happen to choose the “wrong” academic to quote.
And no good saying “well I just know it Dr Spock, youre wrong”. Because Dr Spock will inevitably say that he/sh is the one with the PhD.
In the deferential refined world of Academia thats accepted.
Alas in the real world, its more “democratic”.
The anonymous (as they would have it) world of the internet is probably even less deferential than “real life” and not an ideal platform for academics. Especially if they arent used to being told that they are wrong…….without copious footnotes quoting even more important people than they are.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments